[NYPost] Get ready for a summer of teen mayhem, unless blue-city leaders across the country abandon their commitment to fostering disorder in the name of equity.
The hot new thing is a “takeover” — a Gen-Z euphemism for a riot, often inspired by social media and featuring huge mobs and psychotic car stunts.
Chicago saw several “teen takeovers” over Memorial Day weekend, with dozens of arrests of “youths” running as old as 28.
#1
It was just a couple of years ago here in NE OH multiple summer church festivals were interrupted by feral yoof uproars and random shootings. Sounds like same old, same old.
[Federalist] A known anti-Trump, Democrat mega-donor financed a lawsuit built on allegations from decades earlier to assassinate the character of a sitting president.
The Department of Justice purportedly launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, according to a CNN exclusive published Wednesday, and corporate media rushed to decry the supposed “weaponization” of justice against the writer who accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault. Though the exact nature of the investigation remains uncertain, it’s well worth revisiting the facts that undermine Carroll’s half-baked anti-Trump hit job.
CNN reported that the investigation is centered on whether Carroll committed perjury. Prosecutors, CNN said, are focusing on a deposition Carroll provided in 2022 in which she said she received no outside funding for her lawsuit. Despite her testimony, it turns out billionaire Democrat donor Reid Hoffman paid some of her legal fees and expenses.
U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros said in a statement that the Northern District of Illinois “has not opened — and has never opened — a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll,” though CNN said its “sources reaffirmed the investigation to CNN.” A source told Axios that the DOJ is actually investigating the Hoffman nonprofit organization that paid some of Carroll’s legal fees, and that Carroll “is not the subject of the investigation.”
Whether this reported investigation goes anywhere remains to be seen. But it does remind Americans just how deeply flawed and politically charged the entire case was from the very beginning.
Carroll accused Trump of raping her in a Bergdorf Goodman and then sued him for defamation when he denied it in 2019. Carroll notably declined to press criminal charges against Trump because, according to her, she “would find it disrespectful to the women who are down on the border who are being raped around the clock.” Carroll then filed a second lawsuit in 2022 after the state of New York temporarily changed a statute of limitations law.
That was only one of many suspect aspects of the crusade against Trump.
To recap: A known anti-Trump Democrat mega-donor financed a lawsuit built on allegations by a woman who couldn’t remember the year of the purported assault, and a state changed its laws to facilitate the lawfare — all to assassinate the character of a sitting president who was punished for maintaining his innocence.
#1
Jail them all. Disbar any lawyers who participated.
Posted by: Super Hose ||
05/31/2026 10:16 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Absolutely, SH. Enough of these made-up cases. Any attorney and any judge who brings and allows a lawfare case ought to get a one-way ticket to the slammer for a long time.
[Breitbart] The top movies at the United Kingdom box office from the past three years are more likely to feature a lead actor named Chris than a female lead actor over the age of 60, according to a study conducted by Age Without Limits.
“Among the 100 highest grossing films for 2023, 2024 and 2025, six films featured someone called Chris as the lead actor compared to just five featuring women over 60 as the lead character,” the U.K.-based organization said.
Moreover, the research also found that films are four times more likely to star a talking animal rather than a female character played by an actress older than 60.
Bailing while the ship sinks. What difference does it make when ticket purchases keep falling because the films are politically correct awfulness?
Nothing. You get economies of scale, no exposure to air, and according to an Australian friend, if you are at a festival, you can take out the plastic bladder and inflate it for a pillow.
[FoxNews] U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon filed a motion Friday seeking the recusal of Atlanta U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross from a key election-integrity case after Ross admittedly – and illegally – attended a partisan Democrat fundraiser for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. Obviously, Ross’ attendance makes clear she isn't impartial.
But this is just the beginning of Ross’s legal troubles. Indeed, news recently emerged that she defiled and dishonored her position by admittedly having years of extramarital sexual relations with Atlanta deputy police chief Kelley Collier in her chambers during work hours–trysts overheard by her staff.
Ick. The things one would rather not know about one’s colleagues.
She lied about it when caught. She retaliated against her staff who reported it.
Yet this egregious workplace sexual misconduct, lying and obstruction of justice resulted in her receiving a mere private reprimand -- a woefully lenient and inadequate disciplinary action — from the federal judiciary. Ross should either resign or face impeachment from Congress for her egregious misconduct. She should also face federal criminal prosecution for lying to federal investigators.
The Atlanta Police Department has many cases before Ross’s court. Collier, Ross’s regular courthouse booty call, is a nearly 30-year veteran who runs the Community Services Division and is married. It was only through "happenstance," according to the Eleventh Circuit Judicial Council, that Ross did not preside over any cases involving that division while their affair was ongoing. Avoiding a clear and predictable conflict of interest through luck alone doesn’t absolve Ross. Nothing suggests that, had Ross received such a case assignment, she would have terminated the affair. Ross is also married; her husband is DeKalb County Circuit Judge Brian Ross.
And what does Hizzoner think about this foofaraw?
The affair took place in close proximity to her law clerks, young lawyers for whom Ross was supposed to serve as a role model. Indeed, a former law clerk reported the affair to disciplinary authorities. Ross used her judicial chambers to conduct the sexual relationship. And this wasn’t a one time slip-up. This egregious sexual misconduct occurred over the course of several years, from 2023 until 2025. Ross cursed at staff when they lodged appropriate objections to her illegal behavior. Retaliatory behavior against a whistleblower who reported a judge’s wrongdoing has no place in our federal judiciary.
Ross, appointed by former President Obama,
Who here is not surprised?
also attended the political event for Willis, the legal embarrassment who secured a sweeping, lawless, politically-motivated indictment against President Trump and nearly 20 other defendants in 2023. The courts later disqualified Willis after news emerged that she had also maintained an inappropriate workplace sexual relationship with a special prosecutor on the case, Nathan Wade.
“I just wanted to fit in with the office culture, donchaknow.”
Ross attended a party to celebrate Willis’s victory in a Democrat primary. Ethical canons forbid judges from attending such partisan political events.
Yes, well ethics. So old fashioned!
"It takes a village." Beehive hut photo here please.
Posted by: Chris ||
05/31/2026 1:14 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Chris may be correct. It is just another part of the trail of slime left behind by the Obama's. More parasites embedded in the body of The People by the never-sufficiently-damned half white-half black commie.
Posted by: definitely not Whiskey Mike ||
05/31/2026 3:20 Comments ||
Top||
#3
"Surprised not really, but I bet her 2 adult kids sure are.
[Bee] Democrats have forcefully condemned Republicans for going so low as to play videos of Senate candidate James Talarico saying things.
Calling it a "dirty, underhanded tactic," Democrats said the attack ads, which show unedited videos of Talarico talking, really make him look bad.
"I never dreamed Republicans would stoop so low as to show people what Talarico says," said Democratic strategist Samantha Parsons. "Broadcasting clips of real things a candidate says is nothing short of a war crime. This heralds a dark new chapter for our democracy."
According to sources, the Democrats' ire was drawn by Republicans taking to social media to post actual videos of Talarico explaining his beliefs. "Yes, these videos are disgusting, but we play to win," said Republican operative Philip Darst. "We're not going to back down from sharing unaltered footage of Talarico saying stuff. Politics is a dirty business."
At publishing time, Republicans had condemned Democrats for sharing videos of Ken Paxton saying things.
Posted by: Frank G ||
05/31/2026 12:19 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[1808 views]
Top|| File under: Commies
[NYPost] Last week, New York state Democrats did what they do best: They jammed what will ultimately prove to be unpopular and counterproductive restrictions on immigration enforcement into the state budget. They did it with bail reform. They did it with juvenile justice reform. And they did it with criminal discovery reform. While frustration is an appropriate emotional response to this development, surprise is not.
The changes being pushed through the recently passed budget bill are sweeping. According to reporting by The Post and others, the package includes measures:
Banning law-enforcement agencies within the state from engaging in any formal or informal cooperation with federal immigration authorities;
Banning federal law-enforcement agents from concealing their faces;
Creating a state law right of action for New Yorkers to sue federal agents they believe violated their rights; and
Prohibiting state jails from holding offenders on behalf of immigration authorities.
If New York was a “sanctuary state” before, it will soon be a sanctuary state on steroids once the budget is signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul. All of these measures fall somewhere between deeply misguided and legally suspect.
First of all, the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause — which subordinates state law to federal law — makes clear that states cannot regulate federal entities, which means that federal courts may ultimately strike down some of these measures, depending on how they are enforced against federal authorities.
Secondly, further restricting cooperation between local and federal law enforcement on immigration-related matters will undermine the safety and security of many New York communities.
Hochul argues that such cooperation undermines local policing. Per Spectrum News, Hochul stated, “When [local police are] diverted into becoming ICE agents, literally doing their job with civil immigration enforcement, they’re not focused on what we need them to do.”
This is purposeful obfuscation on the governor’s part. Local police often encounter illegal immigrants through everyday police work. The idea that allowing officers who’ve arrested someone for a crime through the normal course of discharging their duties should be prohibited from notifying ICE when that person happens to be an illegal immigrant — particularly one on whom ICE has placed a detainer — is a strange one.
In departments operating under 287(g) agreements through which local officers are also deputized as federal agents, whatever time officers spend on federal matters will be compensated by federal authorities. More importantly, however, allowing cooperation with ICE may be the best hope a community has of getting an active offender off the street for any significant amount of time.
In the post-bail reform era, many offenders (even chronic and violent ones) will find themselves back on the street within hours of their arrests.
That reality has proven frustrating to both law-enforcement officers (who risk their lives to take offenders into custody only to see them waltz right out of the courthouse) as well as the community members harmed by offenders the system doesn’t seem isn’t willing to hold.
“Due to the escalating situation at Delaney Hall and the increasing need for police intervention, immediate action is required to protect public safety,” he wrote in a message on X.
[GatesOfVienna] Failure to Anticipate Old Dominion Shooting Shows Glaring Holes in FBI’s Lackluster Approach to Counterterrorism
In March, Mohammed Bailor Jalloh
…36, previously in the Rantburg archives as Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, naturalized citizen of Sierra Leone, killed one in his second try for the glory of ISIS in a ROTC classroom in Old Dominion before the students killed him with their bare hands (and a knife)…
entered a classroom at Old Dominion University in Virginia and asked if it was a ROTC class. Upon learning that it was, he yelled "Allahu Akhbar" and started shooting. The jihad attack left the class instructor dead and two students maimed. Jalloh was subdued by students and killed by one with a knife.
Jalloh was convicted of a terrorism charge in 2017 and released from prison in December 2024, begging the questions: Was the Old Dominion attack preventable? Was Jalloh on the FBI’s radar? If not, why not?
After the attack, the Sharia TipSheet sent queries to the FBI National Press Office. THERE WAS NO RESPONSE to these critical questions:
Did the FBI monitor Mohammed Bailor Jalloh after he was released, as it has other convicted Lions of Islam in the past?
If not, why not?
If so, what did the monitoring consist of? [Editor’s Note: common techniques include tailing, communications monitoring, and financial tracking.]
Does the FBI currently monitor anyone convicted of terrorism charges after they are released from prison?
If so, what factors go into the decision to monitor certain individuals and not others?
Reportedly, the FBI used to monitor convicted Lions of Islam upon release. If the FBI stopped such monitoring, why?
Reportedly, the FBI is automatically notified by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) when an inmate with a terrorism conviction is scheduled for release. Was the FBI notified of Jalloh’s release? If so, what did the FBI do with the information? If it is not the FBI’s job to monitor released terrorists, then why are you notified of their release?
Have any changes been made to monitoring policy as a result of this case? If not, why not?
The TipSheet informed the FBI the TipSheet would argue the Old Dominion case is another example of the FBI missing clues that could have prevented a terrorist attack on U.S. soil. Previous examples of the FBI missing clues include the Boston Marathon bombing and the San Bernardino and Orlando massacres. The FBI was asked whether it had anything to say in its defense.
Again the response was CRICKETS.
Despite ongoing statements of intent and actual attacks by jihadis, the FBI has missed clues in doctrinally-motivated terrorism plots, including the Boston Marathon bombing and the San Bernardino and Orlando massacres. Former FBI director Robert Mueller told Congress he was unaware that the Islamic Society of Boston had played a prominent role in the radicalization of the Tsarnaev brothers.
The TipSheet contends the repeated instances of missing clues is a result of the FBI’s purge of standard counterterrorism training materials in use before the introduction of the watered-down Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) approach in 2011. CVE homogenizes all domestic threats, placing Islamic jihadis on par with PETA activists. The purge of standard counterterrorism concepts and trainers is why the FBI missed clues in these spectacular jihad attacks. Federal personnel are no longer trained in Islamic war doctrine or in the means and methods of the massive jihadi network in the U.S. Couple this with other acts of unilateral disarmament — such as the order given to the late Philip Haney to destroy a database of potential jihadists targeting America — and the potential for devastation is self-evident. Haney wrote See Something, Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government’s Submission to Jihad.
Other observers have criticized the FBI’s performance in the Old Dominion case, as well:
Phone records show Jalloh traveled to his gun supplier’s house, then to a mosque where he stayed more than nine hours.
The Justice Department knew in 2017 Jalloh viewed his terrorist activity in religious terms and as affording him a path to heaven. But this blaring ideological commitment apparently wasn’t enough to make Jalloh a priority for monitoring upon his release from prison in 2024.
The FBI has misplaced priorities, like chasing Catholics in Richmond, which is causing it to lose focus on what really matters.
The FBI is falling down on the job of counterterrorism. The FBI admitted as much in a report in 2020. The job of rectifying the situation begins with understanding the standard Islamic doctrines of world domination and violent mostly peaceful jihad as the means to achieve it. The FBI needs to jettison CVE, bring back proven counterterrorism techniques, and rehire the purged trainers who knew their stuff. It also needs to change its lackadaisical attitude toward Lions of Islam who are released from prison and monitor at least some of them on a selective basis. Otherwise, the nation can look forward to more missed clues, more Boston Marathon bombings, more Orlando and San Bernardino-style massacres, more Ft. Hood rampages, and more Old Dominion-type shootings. And it will be the FBI’s fault, no question. The Bureau is ideologically screwed up and can’t think it’s way out of a paper bag when comes to the existential threat Islam poses to the nation. The Bureau has had plenty of time to get its act together and must be held accountable.
#3
Simple answer: was Mohammed Bailor Jalloh attending Latin Catholic Mass? Was Mohammed Bailor Jalloh associated with Jan 6? Was Mohammed Bailor Jalloh ever seen wearing a MAGA hat? If the answer is ‘no’ to all of these questions then Mohammed Bailor Jalloh was not monitored by the FBI.
#5
The Biden Administration considered us to have fallen behind most EU countries with respect to the race to our downfall. They did their best to get us back on the track that Obama had begun.
Posted by: Super Hose ||
05/31/2026 10:22 Comments ||
Top||
#6
Jalloh was released from Federal Custody in Dec 24 in the last month of the Biden Admin.
Posted by: Lord Garth ||
05/31/2026 19:19 Comments ||
Top||
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
