You have commented 376 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Canada Trade Negotiator Admits The Inevitable - And Sundance Explains The Trumpian Ending of the Marshal Plan World Economy
2026-10-24
[ConservativeTreehouse] Two fundamental issues that Canadian politicians and media keep hidden from Canadians. First, in the 2025 U.S. Supreme Court decision last year about tariffs, the court outlined that the executive branch can constitutionally ban trade with another country. Second, the U.S. can exit the USMCA with a six-month notification.

There is an awful lot of pretending and gaslighting within this general discussion segment; purposefully advanced to keep the Canadian people in the dark. However, that said, Canada’s chief trade negotiator to the United States, Janice Charette does admit that tariff free access to the U.S market is lost forever.

Janice Charette is participating in a discussion at the Toronto Global Forum, where she is questioned by Brian Tobin, vice chair of the BMO Financial Group about the trade relationship with the United States and the opinion that many Canadian officials have espoused that Canada just needs to outlast President Donald Trump.

Charette informs the audience that regardless of who is the U.S. President, tariffs will likely remain in place permanently because the amount of revenue being generated to the U.S. Treasury is too great for any President or congress to stop. PROMPTED – WATCH:
Half hour video at the link.
While almost all of her analysis is flawed, skewed and seriously underestimates the nature of the dynamic that Canada is facing, what Janice Charette outlines about how Donald Trump has shifted the national revenue model using global tariffs to offset national expenditures (her baseline) is accurate.

Beyond her statement it is worth pausing for a moment and using Charette’s frame of reference to reconsider the post WWII European revenue model. It was/is President Trump’s model in reverse.

The Marshal plan, was essentially one-way tariffs on American trade that provided one-way benefits (revenue) that permitted the EU to rebuild after the second world war. To Charlette’s framework, how willing was the EU mindset to change this beneficial economic outcome?

Answer: The EU fought it (and is still fighting it), perceiving the elimination of that benefit as an existential threat to their economic power. The EU became reliant on the Marshal Plan.

In many ways Canada made the same economic mistake.

Canada legislated and built their economy around dependencies they never thought would go away.

They disassembled their dirty “carbon emitting” jobs. They took apart their energy foundation. They deindustrialized in an effort to join/lead the world in their virtue signaling around clean energy. Canada intentionally chose to take a series of steps to make their economy less independent, less strong and much less resilient; while worshipping at the altar of the “climate change” religion.

Tariff free access to the USA market, while combining non-tariff protectionist barriers to USA imports formed the foundation of this progressive system. Without the benefit of tariff-free trade with the USA, Canada could never have deindustrialized and become an economy dependent on: (1) shipping out raw materials for dirty processing in other countries; then (2) reimporting the finished component goods for assembly in Canada.

Finally, a person steps forth to stop this one-way benefit. Along came Donald Trump.

When Canada was told those USA dependencies will no longer be permitted and reciprocity will frame the new trade agreement, suddenly all those decades-long deindustrialized vulnerabilities surfaced. This is their current status.

That’s why former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told President-elect Trump the “reciprocity” demand was no longer feasible; which led to the 51st state response.

The current problem is that ‘elbow’s up’ Canada continues to maintain economic denial about their status.
Related:
Tariffs: 2026-10-14 Reform UK Threatens Sanctions on Six Countries Refusing to Accept Deportees
Tariffs: 2026-10-12 Canada's Anti-Trump Government Tightening Ties with China Is a Choice for Economic Decline
Tariffs: 2026-10-12 The midterm strategy driving Democrats deep into Trump country
Related:
Canada: 2026-10-23 Jewish child had to explain why gas chamber taunts were wrong. Now adults are sneering at evidence of antisemitism in schools. What has gone wrong in Britian? Shomrim volunteers had to detain a suspect.
Canada: 2026-10-22 Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: October 21, 2026
Canada: 2026-10-21 Many Western Governments Won't survive
Related:
USMCA: 2026-10-12 Canada's Anti-Trump Government Tightening Ties with China Is a Choice for Economic Decline
USMCA: 2026-09-16 Migrant remittances nearly double over decade to $728.6 billion in 2025: UN agency
USMCA: 2026-08-20 The Canada Trade Deal: The deal will include comprehensive market access for all American goods, economic security commitments, digital trade alignment, and many important provisions that will continue to protect our market and American workers,
Posted by:NoMoreBS

00:00