Comments

You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

Africa North

Imported From Egypt: The extremist ideology that inspired Boko Haram

2026-09-01

by Aliyu Dahiru
31 Aug 2026

[HumAngleMedia] This is the story of how modern Islamist extremism emerged from the edge of an African prison and moved into Nigeria, escalating into an unending fire of insurgency.

In August 2016, Mamman Nur, one of Boko Haram’s foremost commanders, dramatically sat before a camera on the shore of the Sambisa Forest, a vast terrorist hideout in North East Nigeria. He publicly accused the group’s supreme leader, Abubakar Shekau, of doctrinal deviance and transgressions. He said Abubakar had become power-drunk, killing his own commanders over minor disagreements and spilling the blood of fellow Muslims.

And it is an article of faith that no good Moslem would ever harm a fellow Moslem. Not validated by experience, but nonetheless often trumpeted.

He named several terrorist figures Shekau had killed, including Mustapha Chad, Abu Amr Falluja, Kaka Allai and Mallam Ba’ana Banki.

He titled the recording Exposé, deliberately weaponising the same word Shekau had used to attack his critics. He also invoked the words of the former Islamic State spokesman Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, saying: “Whoever changes, we will also change him.” His message was not only a threat; it was also a campaign to depose Shekau as the leader of the terror group. Within months, Mamman’s faction formally broke away to become the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), as Shekau led the Jama’atu Ahlussunnah Lidda’awati wal Jihad (JAS). This movement had existed before Boko Haram pledged allegiance to the Islamic State.

Behind the sudden division lay an unfolding theological debate within the global Salafi-jihadi movements for decades. It revolved around one question that has repeatedly divided jihadist organisations from the Middle East to the Lake Chad Basin: How far can the practice of takfir – declaring other Muslims as non-believers – go before this doctrine, which is meant to validate jihad, starts to undermine the very concept of jihad itself?

The other question, in the years following the American response to 9/11, is how much pain and destruction must the Ummah absorb as a result the strong jihad of the sword against the lands of the Unbelievers, Dar al Harb, and is there a point where the high cost is proof that Allah did not approve of that particular effort by that particular group? The conclusion for a while was that Al Qaeda crossed the line by attacking America, but then ISIS came along, and thinking once again fell by the wayside in favour of wielding sharp bits of metal and things that kaboom, though the remaining Shiites aiming at Israel might be starting to ponder the addressing the question.

Drawing on Boko Haram’s internal correspondence, Arabic treatises, multimedia recordings, and local sermons, HumAngle traces how an ideology born in Egypt travelled through Jordan, Iraq, and Syria before taking root in northeastern Nigeria. What later appeared as a personal power struggle between Shekau and Mamman Nur was, in reality, the culmination of a decades-long ideological dispute over faith, authority, governance, and the limits of violence. The journey that turned the former terrorist allies into bitter enemies began several decades back, in an Egyptian prison cell.

The story begins with Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian author and one of the foremost figures in modern Sunni Islamic revivalism. He’s the author of a popular Islamist book, Ma’alim fi al-Tariq, mostly known as Milestones, which he wrote while in prison under the Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, and published shortly before his execution in 1966. The book was said to have transformed a classical Islamic concept into a revolutionary political doctrine.

The term “jahiliyya” literally referred to the pre-Islamic Arabian era before the Prophet Muhammad’s message, but Sayyid gave it a radically different meaning in his book. He argued that contemporary Muslim societies had fallen back into a new jahiliyya because they accepted political systems that placed human authority above divine law.

More at the link

Posted by:badanov

00:00