| Submit your comments on this article |
| Africa Subsaharan |
| Ghana’s Northern Sovereignty Gap: JNIM and the Burkinabe Border |
| 2026-07-15 |
| [AfricanArguments] In May 2024, Ghana’s former Ambassador to Burkina Faso, Boniface Gambila, offered a candid description of what happens along Ghana’s 602-kilometer border with its northern neighbor: ‘Believe it or not, they are able to come into Ghana and go back. They move in and go back.’ He was talking about operatives of the Group for Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM), al-Qaeda’s Sahelian affiliate, which has spent years waging war in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger while establishing a logistics and support network that spans both sides of the Ghanaian-Burkinabe border. A senior Ghanaian security official, interviewed in 2024, explained the state’s posture toward this arrangement with equal frankness: the threat of an attack by JNIM ‘is why we don’t disturb them too much.’ These statements describe a form of what has been called a sovereignty gap, the distance between a state’s authority and its capacity. Ghana’s case reflects a distinctive variant. Ghana’s choice not to contest JNIM likely reflects officials’ lack of confidence in the outcome, but it may also reflect concerns that confrontation would destabilise northern regions where national elections are competitive enough that small shifts in local allegiance can determine outcomes. The gap that results isn’t between the state’s authority and its capacity, but between its authority and its willingness to exercise it. SOVEREIGNTY WITHHELD Security analyst Kwesi Aning observed in a 2025 iWatch Africa report that Ghana hasn’t invested in its borders since the 1950s, and the conditions at the boundary with Burkina Faso bear this out. At the Hamile border post in the Upper West Region, immigration officers said that during the dry season, ‘every route becomes a potential crossing.’ ‘Some people just pass through. We can’t track them, we don’t even see them,’ one said. Surveillance systems are inadequate, and officers lack even basic tools to control movement. Ghana’s sovereignty gap along the Burkinabe border is a territorial condition, observable in the physical absence of the state from a space it formally governs. A 2026 study found that proximity to the Burkina Faso border significantly lowers civilian trust in the military while increasing trust in traditional authorities and community defense groups, confirming that the state’s absence is shaping who borderlanders turn to for security. JNIM has organized itself around this absence. The borderlands function as connective tissue between JNIM’s war in Burkina Faso and the Ghanaian communities that economically sustain it. Stolen Burkinabe cattle flow south into Ghanaian markets, where militants sell livestock seized as forced ‘zakat’ payments through intermediaries at a fraction of market price. Weapons move in both directions: high-caliber arms from JNIM’s Burkinabe arsenals have fed the Bawku conflict with JNIM accused of selling to both factions, while commercial explosives from Ghana’s mining sector have been traced to JNIM- controlled sites in Burkina Faso and Mali. JNIM fighters also use northern Ghana as a logistical staging ground and medical base, crossing freely and routinely. Analysts have concluded that JNIM’s restraint toward Ghana appears calculated, as the group avoids disrupting supply chains it depends on. Where the Ghanaian state sees a peripheral frontier, JNIM sees space for its operations. More at the link |
| Posted by:badanov |