| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Great Cultural Revolution |
| Let Them Eat Twinkies: A Short History of Getting American Hunger Wrong |
| 2025-12-22 |
| [PJMEDIA] A few days ago, I read a piece in which a man was quoted as saying, flatly, “I ate dog food,” because he was so poor. The line snagged in my mind, not because I doubted that he had struggled, but because I doubted the arithmetic. It brought back a much older memory. In the 1980s and 1990s, media stories, television shows, and political rhetoric frequently claimed that elderly Americans were so destitute, they were “forced to eat cat food,” because it was all they could afford. I remember hearing this as a child, and even then it didn’t ring true. I’ve been a pet owner most of my life. I know what cat and dog food cost, even the cheap stuff. And as a mom who often lived on the edge of poverty, I know what human staples cost, too. Tuna, ramen, rice, beans, oatmeal — these have always been cheaper, pound for pound and calorie for calorie, than commercially prepared pet food. So I started wondering: where did this story come from? The answer, as it turns out, has very little to do with actual diets, and a great deal to do with symbolism. The “eating cat food” trope did not emerge from grocery receipts or nutritional studies. It emerged from political rhetoric in the late 1960s and 1970s, during debates over Social Security, Medicare, and elderly poverty. It appeared in speeches, fundraising appeals, and eventually television scripts, usually off-screen and never examined too closely. The phrase was meant to shock, not to be audited. That’s a tell. When a claim is emotionally powerful, but strangely resistant to scrutiny — never shown, never priced, never compared to alternatives — it is usually doing symbolic work rather than descriptive work. “Cat food” was not chosen because it was realistic. It was chosen because it carried a moral payload. It signaled humiliation and dehumanization, not a literal menu. FAT, HUNGRY, AND UNDERNOURISHED If Americans were facing widespread caloric deprivation, we would see wasting bodies. That is what hunger looks like historically. Instead, we see the opposite: widespread obesity paired with chronic fatigue and persistent hunger. This is not a contradiction. It is a mismatch. Calories are not interchangeable units of nourishment. Three hundred calories of snack cakes do not function the same way in the body as three hundred calories of eggs, beans, or a simple sandwich. Cheap modern food excels at delivering calories that fill briefly and addict long-term, and, crucially, they are ready to eat. That last point is almost always ignored. Ultra-processed food is cheap not only in money, but in time. It requires no planning, no cooking, no cleanup, and no attention. It can be eaten in a car, between shifts, or late at night when the day’s energy is gone. Moon Pies and RC Cola didn’t become cultural staples by accident. In the 1930s, they were explicitly marketed together as a complete, portable lunch for working men, especially in the South, something cheap, filling, shelf-stable, and easy to carry to a job site. They were engineered for immediacy: calorie-dense, instantly consumable, requiring nothing from the eater but a free hand. This is not incidental. It is the product. What we see today traces back to that one movement. By contrast, nearly every food that actually produces lasting satiety requires preparation. Beans must simmer. Meat must cook. Even rice requires time and heat. These costs are trivial to someone with predictable hours and mental bandwidth. They are not trivial to someone exhausted, stressed, or constantly interrupted. The foods that fail to satisfy are optimized for immediacy. The foods that sustain require forethought. And the people most likely to struggle with hunger are the very people whose lives leave the least room for planning ahead. |
| Posted by:NoMoreBS |
| #6 |
| Posted by: Woodrow 2025-12-22 20:06 |
| #5 |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2025-12-22 12:06 |
| #4 |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2025-12-22 11:59 |
| #3 |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2025-12-22 08:36 |
| #2 |
| Posted by: no mo uro 2025-12-22 07:26 |
| #1 |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2025-12-22 06:45 |