Comments

You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

Europe

Clarice Feldman on EU Censorship regime: 'Your speech ends when we say it ends.'

2025-12-08

From the Facebook page of Clarice Feldman

THE ISLANDER @IslanderWORLD
Europe Built a Digital Control Regime
Brussels insisted the Digital Services Act was harmless, a bureaucratic tune-up for the online world. But the moment enforcement began, the truth surfaced: Europe engineered a censorship machine. And the €120 million fine against X is the moment it got exposed.

The DSA foundations were poured in 2014, when Europe panicked over migration, populism, and the collapse of trust in its institutions. What began as back-room “voluntary codes” and secret content-moderation hotlines hardened into a full-blown weapon. A decade in the making. A decade of mission creep. A decade of unelected Eurocrats preparing to rule the digital public square.

Today, the regime is no longer theoretical, it is fully weaponized. And its first chosen target is the only platform arrogant enough, independent enough, not perfect but unmanageable enough to refuse obedience.

Brussels claims the €120M strike against X is about “transparency.” Anyone who has spent five minutes inside European politics knows the truth, this wasn’t enforcement. This was reprisal. A public beating disguised as a regulatory process. A message carved into the balance sheets of the entire tech sector: defy our censorship channels, expose our back-room demands, resist our narrative controls, and we will crush you financially until compliance looks like mercy.

Under the DSA, any platform with more than 45 million European users becomes a deputized censor, forced to obey the most restrictive speech laws in any one of the EU’s 27 member states. A German insult case in Munich? Suddenly enforceable in Madrid. A French hate-speech provision in Paris? Enforced in Prague, Dublin, Tallinn, and beyond. Brussels built the world’s first mechanism where the lowest speech standard becomes the universal one.

And then comes the extraterritorial bombshell... The DSA applies irrespective of where a platform is based. Meaning a bureaucrat in Brussels can dictate what an American in Texas sees. What a journalist in Nairobi writes. What a president in Latin America posts. Platforms will always choose to harmonize globally rather than run two moderation regimes under threat of a 6% revenue kill shot.

Europe has built an exportable ministry of truth, and everyone else is expected to obey.

The warnings are no longer coming from fringes or activists. They’re coming from constitutional scholars, former ACLU leaders, Princeton professors, the FCC, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, all saying the same thing: the DSA is a direct threat to global free speech. A supranational censorship model with no democratic accountability, no meaningful legal recourse, and no boundaries.
And now, with the fine against X, Brussels has moved from theory to force.
This is how power behaves when it feels its grip slipping. You build a censorship hierarchy: Digital Service Coordinators, trusted flaggers, opaque regulators, quasi-NGOs whose funding depends on finding ever more “harmful content.”

You force platforms to pre-censor under threat of annihilation. You redefine political speech as “risk.” You call dissent “manipulation.” You give yourself emergency powers to silence whatever you cannot defeat in open debate.

The fine isn’t the end, it’s the opening salvo.

Because once Europe proves it can financially strangle a platform for not censoring fast enough, every other company will do the math: It’s cheaper to silence users than resist regulators. It’s safer to delete speech than defend it.

And suddenly citizens aren’t silenced by law, they’re silenced by fear. Not by courts, but by algorithms tuned to please bureaucrats. By risk-assessment committees no one elected.

Speech erased by a foreign, Orwellian bureaucracy. Democracy throttled by a system you never voted for. A public square governed by fear, not freedom.
And unless this machinery is resisted, dismantled, or openly defied, the next message from Brussels will be even simpler:

“Your speech ends when we say it ends.”

More from Clarice Feldman:
The EU-US Battle Line
By Clarice Feldman

UK’s Labour Censorship Initiative
As economic and cultural suicide stalk Western Europe, it has initiated efforts to hobble America's technological advantage and diminish our freedoms. The first documented attacks on our open dialogue came from the UK and began in 2018 when Morgan McGreevy, Keir Starmer’s chief of staff (then Labour Together’s managing director), began and funded an outfit called Stop Funding Fake News (SFFN). Recognizing that the online news purveyors could best be silenced by depriving them of funds, it first targeted UK outfits, but moved on in an attempt to starve U.S. outfits like American Thinker, Breitbart, Zero Hedge, and the Federalist of advertising revenue, and astroturfing defamation of such sites.

But it didn’t work — they’re still all here and thriving.