| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government Corruption |
| Playing Smashmouth: AgSec Rollins Taking the Blue States' SNAP |
| 2025-12-03 |
| [Hot Air] Either you follow the rules or you don't get any money. Prepare for another shutdown theater @end of January. If there is one thing you can say as a blanket statement about the Trump cabinet, it's that you know exactly where each of them is coming from and where they are going. There is none of the previous administration's gentle pats on concerned heads and assurances of no ill intentions, usually as they were in the process of planning and executing the exact opposite. No. Trump cabinet members are nothing if not a remarkably unfiltered group of bureaucrats who go about their business and have no problems explaining exactly what it is when asked. It's quite refreshing. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins has been one of those who dove into her role, as opposed to merely occupying a desk. From jumping into a long-simmering international water dispute, to something as seemingly inconsequential as (successfully) saving a small family farm from eminent domain seizure, Rollins has been popping up and making an impact everywhere. So it might have behooved the blue states which are deepest into the Trump resistance movement to be a bit more accommodating when the newly sworn-in Secretary of Agriculture sent around an unambiguous request for their state's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) data in order to comply with the president's executive order. The records were due by COB 30 July.
To date, only 28 states have sent their information to the USDA, most of them red states, and in point of fact, besides refusing, blue states filed suit over the threat of withheld funds. The bleeding hearts at NPR called Rollins' request for data on how federal dollars were spent at the state level 'unprecedented.' In other words, how dare the federal government politely ask for some accounting of where their (aka our) money went once it hit state coffers. Of course, the recipient data had to be 'personal' because 'personal' is how one qualifies for SNAP to begin with, but let's not let such quibbles ruin a good outrage, shall we? ...Earlier this year, the USDA made an unprecedented demand to states to turn over personal data of SNAP recipients. Most Democratic-led states refused, and a federal judge in San Francisco blocked USDA from withholding funding from states that did not comply and found the federal agency's data demand was likely unlawful. With what data she'd received, and her department had parsed, Rollins went on a tear about the waste and fraud in those available statistics. It was enough to make one wonder what horrors were hidden in data being purposefully withheld by notoriously lax welfare states like California, Illinois, and Minnesota. As events concerning the fraud under Governors Tim Walz and Gavin Newsom become more widely exposed, the concern grows, and the impetus to crawl into that fetid blue oubliette of corruption is ever more justified, chorus of 'BUT HUNGRY CHILDREN' be damned. Rollins' first shot across the bow came mid-month in November, thanks to the government shutdown. The USDA had had time to crawl through what they'd received and come to a decision. Rollins announced that they were going to 'deconstruct' the entire program, rebuild it from the ground up,and SNAP beneficiaries would be required to reapply in person.
|
| Posted by:Frank G |
| #5 |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2025-12-03 21:00 |
| #4 |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2025-12-03 14:11 |
| #3 |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2025-12-03 13:51 |
| #2 |
| Posted by: Frank G 2025-12-03 12:16 |
| #1 |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2025-12-03 12:06 |