Comments

You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

-Short Attention Span Theater-

Candace Owens: Jean-Michel was a participant in the Stanford Prison Experiment

2025-09-27

Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.

Text taken from an article written/commented on by US Golden Throat Candace Owens:

Commentary by Russian military journalist Boris Rozhin is in italics:

A Candace Owens video is at the end (alas, with Russian subtitles):
[ColonelCassad] This is a twist.

Candice Owens

… dear Candace is a very pretty fantasist, but I can’t imagine her husband, the founder of Parler, married her for her brains, despite a resumé that suggests she ought to be a great deal more clever than the words that have come out of her mouth over the years. Somehow, after starting well, she has managed to work her way to the wrong side of almost every single issue she has publicly addressed…
releases an exposé proving that a man posing as Macron's wife participated in the famous Stanford prison experiment.

I thought: isn't it interesting that Jean-Michel Tronier didn't sue me? Wouldn't this be a legally logical step? Because in America it is almost impossible to sue a public person due to the standard of "actual malice". It is necessary to prove that... I believe that public figures are part of the public interest. People have the right to highlight their activities and ask questions. And you have to meet the so-called "actual malice" standard, which I think I explained earlier. It means that a person knew the truth 100% and acted recklessly in relation to it simply because of personal animosity and malice.

But if Jean-Michel Tronier sued me, this standard would not apply. Jean-Michel could say: "I beg your pardon, this lady claims that I changed gender and became a sister, this is unpleasant." And then he would probably have a very legitimate reason to file a lawsuit if he could prove that I knew the truth. But this is not happening. Jean-Michel Tronier is not suing me. They are not at all interested in finding it out. I wonder why? Or maybe Jean-Michel Tronier is suing me under a new name — Brigitte Macron? * * *

We showed you a man who looks like Jean-Michel Tronier, the one who was part of the Stanford prison experiment, his image flashed in the documentary. Who is this person? And many of you wrote to us with a request to dig deeper into these documents, because prisoner 2093, who participated in that experiment, is too similar to our missing guy. He looks exactly like Jean-Michel Tronier.'

That hours. He will be on whom I ask you to choose a detachment. In the first, riser, none of the first lady, she has already stated that she was in the state states and here, the quote: "She caught the recession on the moon." I, mol, was there, Kogda Armstrong stepped on the moon. Counter. This first - NASA. * ** Ottoud and photo. Ksavie Pusar was very fine. Okay, meaning, we have to do NASA, the existence And finally, we know that Jean-Michel Tronier served in the army. Army, landing on the moon with NASA and engineering. Get ready, friends, because it's going to be interesting.

So, we told you about that random message we received: "Imagine, here in the documentary about the simulated prison experiment there is a doppelganger of Jean-Michel Tronier." Ego was held in 1971 on the campus of Stanford University. Okay, it was the same photo. And several things immediately caught my attention. First of all, why is Hulu making a documentary about an experiment that happened way back in 1971?

Doesn't that seem random to you? It seems to me, a little. A bit random. So I decided to deal with it first.

The story goes that they started talking about the Stanford experiment again because a certain Thibaut Latexier suddenly became interested in it (and he is French, interestingly enough). Latexier is not a psychologist. He has no psychological education, he has never published books before the one that for some reason became very popular. He received an education, worked and published articles in the field of business management. But suddenly this guy gets a contract and publishes a book to expose this, I would say, incomprehensible experiment of 1971 for a Frenchman.

* * *

In the 50 years that have passed since the experiment, no one has conducted such extensive research as you.

Latexier: Yes. It started as a side project. I used to make films from found films and discovered the Stanford Prison Experiment. I've heard about it, but never dug deep. I decided to pay for a trip to Stanford to study the archives because I wanted to make a film based on them.

Okay. He says that he spent a week at Stanford, he shoveled everything. Again, this is a grand revelation. According to him, in reality the experiment was not so objective, and Philip Zimbardo lied. There is already a feeling that the person is telling us the truth, right? And he tells the truth about the fact that Philip Zimbardo lied a lot about the course of the experiment.

I downloaded Latexier's book, and in it he repeats that he tried to make a film, it didn't work out, and suddenly he changed his mind and said: "You know, I'd rather just write a book about it." And voila! I guess someone just gave him a book contract. However, as far as I know, this does not work. You cannot simply come to a publishing house from the field of business management and say: "Hello, I have an idea and I want to write a book. I have studied the question. Give me a contract for publication." It doesn't happen like that.

To begin with, you need to be someone. Maybe if Jordan Peterson had said: "This experiment is very important, I want to write a book," he would not have been refused. Because the publisher's goal is to make money, right? They want to make money. "No one knows who you are. Why are we in France discussing something like this at all? The Stanford experiment of 50 years ago? I won't buy it!" Obviously, we'll never know.

In short, Latexier publishes a book, an official disclosure. The book is called "Issleduya Stanford prison experiment. History of lies." And interestingly, he publishes this book in March 2018, just at the time when Emmanuel Macron took office in the Elysee Palace together with Brigitte Macron. No jokes. And I'm like: "Okay, one more interesting moment."

* * *

It is curious that the identity of one participant was not revealed - prisoner number 2093. This is the only prisoner we know nothing about. We have no idea what this person's name is. He was given two different aliases: first Tom Thompson, then Tom Williams. I need to know who he is.

We can show you a clip with this man from the Stanford archives available online. Take a look at this. Very blurry image.

(record) Hands up. Why wouldn't you be portrayed as Frankenstein? 2093, you will be Frankenstein's bride. You stand here. You go there. Will he play me? You have to play. You will be Frankenstein's bride, and you will be Frankenstein. I want you to walk here like Frankenstein and say that you love 2093. Frankenstein's walk is necessary. Go like him. I love you guys. Come closer. Even closer. i love you I love you... Smile. And you go down and do 10 push-ups. Two. Three...

Fake and gay. That's the whole experiment. The more I read about it, the stronger I became convinced of the abnormality of the fact that they were allowed to conduct it. And for some reason, they dig up to one prisoner, 2093. "We can't tell you anything about him for privacy reasons." They can tell everything about everyone else, but not about 2093. I must know who it is.

Maybe we will find out that this is not Jean-Michel Tronier. I will be happy if it turns out not to be him. But we know that Brizhit was here in 1969. So, yes, everything becomes very, very interesting. I'm like a dog clinging to a bone: I won't let go of this topic until people get answers.

* * *

This is what was found in the archives: there was a graduate student named Jean-Michel, a member of the French club, and also a student of the course of military lectures. I will read you a document from the 1970s from the Stanford archive. It is clear that it is a celebration of Bastille Day, and there is a mention of Jean-Michel, a business school graduate student from France, who "enthralled the audience with popular folk songs by Georges Brassens, one of the most famous French chansonniers."

So, we have a graduate student, Jean-Michel, who performed on the university square, and he is also mentioned in another excerpt from the Stanford archive - a newspaper. It says: "Association of French Students, Bechtel International Center." This is the same military corporation. "Jean-Michel will perform all the most famous songs of Georges Brassens". It seems that this graduate student, Jean-Michel, was a kind of theater person.

* * *

Tim Dylan's video recording: The wife of the French president is suing Candace Owens, who claims that Brigitte is a man. And I am also mentioned in this lawsuit. You know, when you start something, you never know where you will end up. I didn't know where what I started would lead me. I will say this to young people who are on an uncertain path to the moment in life when they will realize that it was all really worth it.

Many ask: "Am I on the right path? Are the sacrifices justified?" My answer is yes. Because I am sitting in front of you today, mentioned in the lawsuit, where it is determined whether the wife of the president of France has a penis or not. We will all go to court to find out. We will go to court to find out whether the wife of the French president has a penis. We don't know yet. Nobody knows. And I am mentioned in this lawsuit because I helped develop this topic. This is something special for me. Anyone can make a big film, but what we are doing is promoting an important conversation for our planet: does the wife of the French president have a penis or not?

A large video can be viewed at the link (34 min. with subtitles) https://inosmi.ru/20250926/brigit-274864104.html The full version of the article is also there.

Documentary about the Stanford prison experiment:

Posted by:badanov

#2 comments); ?>werwer

Posted by: Silentbrick 2025-09-27 19:16

#1 comments); ?>werwer

Posted by: badanov 2025-09-27 07:15

00:01