You have commented 361 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Ukraine Once Held The World’s 3rd Largest Nuclear Arsenal — Then Gave It All Up
2025-08-11
[X]
…surrendered its nukes for security guarantees from the US, UK, and Russia.

Fast forward: Russia invaded anyway. No nukes to stop it. No ultimate deterrent.

What if Ukraine had kept its nukes?

Would Russia dare invade? Would history be different? Or would the world be on the brink of nuclear chaos?

One thing is clear: Ukraine bet everything on trust — and the stakes couldn’t be higher today.

Your thoughts? Could nukes have changed the game?
"Gave it all up" in return for Russian guarantees of its territorial integrity.
True. But as I recall, the concern at the time was that someone on the Ukraine side would sell the nukes to line their pockets instead of doing the work to keep them safe and secure. Given what we have seen in recent years in both Ukraine and Russia, that seems realistic. Would it have been better or worse for the world?
Posted by:Fred

#1  never did Ukraine have those nuclear weapons, they were always under Russian control
Posted by: Zebulon Ebbavise5691   2025-08-11 05:14  

00:00