| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government Corruption |
| Brennan and Clapper Don't Have A Statute Of Limitations Defense Because They're Continuing The Conspiracy |
| 2025-08-07 |
| [Federalist] ’John Brennan and James Clapper are known liars and are digging themselves into an even deeper hole,’ White House spokesman Davis Ingle told The Federalist. There is a lot of talk about whether former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper are protected by a statute of limitations in their roles in fabricating the Russia hoax. But, as current CIA director John Ratcliffe pointed out, "The statute of limitations doesn’t start to run until the last act in the furtherance of that conspiracy," and the two Russia hoaxers just restarted the clock on July 30, when they decided to pen an op-ed in The New York Times filled with even more lies in an apparent cover-up. Related: John Brennan 08/05/2025 Pam Bondi escalates potential criminal charges for Obama officials involved in 'Russia hoax' with bombshell grand jury order John Brennan 08/03/2025 Clapper And Brennan Said Three Things In NYT Op-Ed. Each Was A Lie John Brennan 08/02/2025 CIA Agent Who Reportedly Authored 2017 Report on Russian Collusion, Now Says She Didn't Write It Related: James Clapper 08/05/2025 Pam Bondi escalates potential criminal charges for Obama officials involved in 'Russia hoax' with bombshell grand jury order James Clapper 08/03/2025 Clapper And Brennan Said Three Things In NYT Op-Ed. Each Was A Lie James Clapper 07/31/2025 Clapper Crew Threatened Whistleblower Who Refused To Sign Off On Fabricated Intel Assessment |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #8 Argue for a change of venue demonstrating the inherent liberal bias of the DC courts, grand jury, voter registration pool. |
| Posted by: Jack Salami 2025-08-07 18:07 |
| #7 "The process is the punishment" works both ways |
| Posted by: Matt 2025-08-07 15:34 |
| #6 an intelligent juror This was a DC-based pool. Chances were minimal |
| Posted by: Frank G 2025-08-07 14:59 |
| #5 only plausible crime that could stick is malicious sedition and although there might be enough for an indictment, I don't think there is anywhere enough for a conviction btw, a few J6 folk were convicted of malicious sedition (I didn't think there was enough to make that stick either and in fact I thought an intelligent juror would laugh when presented the evidence but then again, what do I know) |
| Posted by: Lord Garth 2025-08-07 14:38 |
| #4 Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2025-08-07 08:20 |
| #3 18 USC Ch. 115: TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES US Code section §2381. Treason It just states enemies. So wouldn't that include Foreign and/or Domestic persons. Also under SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES. Wouldn't Subversive Actions include, those FED's and hired LSD's imbedded and mixed in the Jan 6er's, with instructions to incite, allow and steer protesters into certain areas to do things? |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2025-08-07 07:47 |
| #2 Treason must involve a foreign power. Sedition is natively born. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2025-08-07 07:20 |
| #1 Based on a few quick data checks. Treason DOES NOT have a Statute of Limitations. Subversive activities, depend on the nature of the offense, and therefore may have specific limitations. Ref Source, the US LEGAL CODE. |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2025-08-07 06:31 |