| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government Corruption |
| JP Morgan Paid $290m To Epstein Victims - For Nothing? |
| 2025-07-19 |
[X]
…$290 million unless there’s something to settle. Victims were real. So were the crimes. Which means someone - likely many someones - committed them. Funny (crazy) how the money moved fast... but the client list still can’t. Source: @TRHLofficial , @Chesschick01 , Reuters |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #4 List or no list, look what happened with the Diddy trial; have to get that aspect taken care of before anything. As far as I understand they didn't even explore the biggest open secret of assault, extortion, blackmail using compromising video required to be made to join the label. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2025-07-19 12:07 |
| #3 I don't think anyone believes this is all about because nothing happened; as I posited yesterday if the evidence is corrupted for wiped with a cloth, wouldn't making the accusation, like the WSJ did, without a proper case open one to a defamation lawsuit? Let me ask another question - can one open the files of the grand jury part of a case in which the proper case portion has had a non-disclosure settlement? |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2025-07-19 10:26 |
| #2 I disagree with Trump about this being relevant. The rich, the celebrities and the royals don’t get to prostitute our kids and get away with it because their names aren’t Jesus or Manuel. Sure this happened awhile ago, but anyone who believes that these crimes were isolated incidents for these people haven’t studied the behavior of Al Gore since he lost the 2000 election. These people could have gone to Cannes or Rio, but they went to Epstein Island knowing exactly what was being proffered by Satanic Mr Rourke. If Epstein was on the payroll of the US taxpayer, that’s revenant too because that implicates me and I don’t like that. |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2025-07-19 07:12 |
| #1 Buying silence can be very expensive. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2025-07-19 03:12 |