You have commented 361 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic       
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
US to ditch B-1B bombers due to their vulnerability to Russian air defenses
2025-07-19
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[Regnum] The US Air Force is likely to abandon the B-1B Lancer strategic bombers, since they do not meet the current level of air defense of potential adversaries — Russia and China. This was reported on July 16 by the American magazine The National Interest (TNI).

"As the U.S. Air Force shifts its focus to air-to-air conflicts, the B-1B Lancer's moderate stealth makes it less suited to modern peer-to-peer conflicts. While it remains a relatively effective long-range bomber, the B-1B's days are numbered," the publication states.

The authors of the article point out that against the backdrop of its increasingly powerful competitors with modern air defense systems, the B-1B Lancer looks outdated. At the same time, given the US focus on countering future threats, the country's air force will only need the most effective machines.

As reported by Regnum News Agency, on July 17, the WSJ also noted that Russian ballistic missiles are creating difficulties for Patriot air defense missile systems in Ukraine, since they bypass their radars. According to the source of the publication, in recent months, Patriot air defense missile system radars have failed to detect Russian missiles.

Konstantin Sivkov, Deputy President for Information Policy at the Russian Academy of Rocket and Artillery Sciences, also previously stated that Russia, if certain conditions are met, would be able to repel an attack by American Tomahawk missiles.

Posted by:badanov

#10  (And to maintain some degree of R & D & manufacturing capability for future possible wars ... we are in the 1930s, building P-40s etc. for use in China and USSR, and developing the P-51s for when we needed them.)
Posted by: Glenmore   2025-07-19 15:40  

#9  "Billions spent, and for what?"
Well, for deterrence, and it has worked, so far ... no nuclear wars....
Posted by: Glenmore   2025-07-19 15:34  

#8  The B-1 won’t be retired any more than the B-52 will be retired. It is still useful and the cost of replacement is exorbitant.
Posted by: Super Hose   2025-07-19 07:23  

#7  ....It's been understood for a while now that USAF wanted to retire the Bone somewhere in the early 2030s - they have always been maintenance hogs and frankly they're not getting any better. That was however dependent on getting what became the B-21 into service on time and in sufficient numbers - which looks like it's going to happen, more or less. Mr. Bone has at least 10 years left.

Mike
Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2025-07-19 07:22  

#6  And we still went to war with Iran.

Ever since they stormed our embassy and took the diplomatic staff hostages. They've at least treated war as war unlike those Westerners who try to avoid calling it what it is.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2025-07-19 07:14  

#5  And we still went to war with Iran.
Why exactly, again?


Because your nation-builder Bush II turned Iran into a regional superpower by turning Iran's only natural enemy into Iranian province?
Posted by: Grom the Affective   2025-07-19 04:07  

#4  No, definitely not just you.
Posted by: Besoeker   2025-07-19 02:56  

#3  ^.Maybe not.
Posted by: Xyz   2025-07-19 00:58  

#2  Maybe it's just me.

Yeah.
It's just you.
Posted by: Glavins Big Foot8166   2025-07-19 00:22  

#1  The whole point of the B-1 was to streak into the USSR at supersonic speeds and nuke them before they could react.
The B-31 is similarly already obsolete. Billions spent, and for what?
No detention centers for illegal aliens but the military-industrial complex gets everything it wants.
I'm starting to think weapons and military aren't good use of our money.
And maybe we should stop starting wars all over the planet.
Maybe it's just me.
We should nominate a presidential candidate and have him run on an explicitly anti-war platform.
And then elect him in a landslide, handing him a democratic mandate.
And we still went to war with Iran.
Why exactly, again?
Oh right because Iran tried to assassinate our anti-war candidate.
Netanyahu confirmed it, Mossad intelligence said Iran was behind it.
Posted by: Elmomoter Mussolini9149   2025-07-19 00:12  

00:00