Submit your comments on this article |
Science & Technology |
Under The Guise Of ‘Preventative Medicine' For IVF, Eugenics Is Back |
2025-06-07 |
![]() The old eugenics was of course the study and practice of shaping a population through selective breeding based on heritable traits deemed desirable, and the sterilization or prohibition on reproduction for those deemed undesirable. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, eugenics produced a nasty set of policies, both in the United States and Europe. These policies were eventually discredited and discarded in part because Nazi Germany was big on eugenics. It was official Nazi policy, for example, to identify various groups of German citizens deemed "unfit" and then systematically kill them with poison gas — a practice that turned out to be a precursor to the Holocaust. But now eugenics is making a comeback thanks to Peter Thiel-inspired libertarian tech-bros who have, no kidding, rebranded it "preventative medicine." This week, a company called Nucleus Genomics, a genetics testing startup founded by a 25-year-old named Kian Sadeghi, unveiled a new product called Nucleus Embryo that allows parents to screen embryos created through IVF by projected IQ, height, eye color, and hundreds of other traits before deciding which to implant and which to discard. The company is marketing this new product, which costs $5,999, as "preventative medicine," a hi-tech health tool that delivers what the company calls "polygenic risk scores," meant to predict the likelihood of things like Alzheimer’s, heart disease and various cancers — among many other things, including IQ, height, and hundreds of other traits. But calling it "preventative medicine" is just a bit of lazy legerdemain. It doesn’t change the fact that Nucleus Embryo is nothing more than a hi-tech form of eugenics — screening the unborn for "desirable" traits like IQ and snuffing out those deemed undesirable or unfit. Much like the Nazis would have done if they’d had such technology. As Michael Knowles noted on X, "To be clear, this technology does not help you extend your baby’s life; it provides information — and dubious information, at that — to help you kill your weakest children." |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#11 The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class and rapidly flipping the US economy on its head![]() |
Posted by: Skidmark 2025-06-07 12:43 |
#10 They're not against eugenics because they think it son't work. They're scared it WILL work. And it will. Breeding for desirable characteristics is done with dogs, cats, pigs, all of your higher mammals. Of course we could screen for intelligence. We would eliminate antisemitism in a single generation. |
Posted by: Jairong+Scourge+of+the+Gepids2435 2025-06-07 11:22 |
#9 Less than 80 IQ is why there's instructions on shampoo bottles |
Posted by: Frank G 2025-06-07 11:16 |
#8 This sounds like the early stages of GATTACA. Inevitable, really. |
Posted by: Cured Romantic 2025-06-07 11:08 |
#7 Not at all, Matt. They follow closely where they are guided — they use their intelligence, such as it is, to parrot, not to think. They have all the impulsiveness of the trainable mentally retarded workers in the sheltered workshop my mother set up back in the early 1970s, with none of the loving hearts and eagerness to contribute meaningfully that were Mama’s clients’ foremost characteristics. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2025-06-07 11:02 |
#6 And yet students at Harvard and Columbia have both above-average IQ scores and a mental age of 12. It's a conundrum. |
Posted by: Matt 2025-06-07 10:25 |
#5 Less than 80 IQ gets you a population that might be easily led, yes, but they also couldn’t be trusted to anything useful on their own — and what good is a servant class if they need to be closely supervised because they have a mental age of twelve? |
Posted by: trailing wife 2025-06-07 08:47 |
#4 As long as the other Male Brain is doing the thinking, any female will do. Eugenics will have a losing battle with the general population. With that fact stated. Wouldn't the Globalists Elites want a large < 80 IQ population to maintain control while engaging in a form of selective breeding themselves for superior genes and control issues? Side Note: History has shown selective breeding has failed Royalty a number of times also. |
Posted by: NN2N1 2025-06-07 07:00 |
#3 /\ You can't abolish selection. And it's cheaper to have it before birth than after. "We'll always have |
Posted by: Besoeker 2025-06-07 03:54 |
#2 You can't abolish selection. And it's cheaper to have it before birth than after. |
Posted by: Grom the Reflective 2025-06-07 03:48 |
#1 Back? It never went away. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2025-06-07 03:25 |