Comments

You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

-Land of the Free

This Is Huge in Locating Illegals-The IRS knows all the multiple SSAN filers locations-the Lynchpin clue of illegals working undercover in the US

2025-03-24

[CNN] IRS nearing agreement to use its data to help ICE locate undocumented migrants
diCicco...
The IRS is close to finalizing an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security to help locate migrants suspected of being in the US illegally, a person familiar with the matter said, as President Donald Trump continues his hardline deportation push.

The agreement would require Immigration and Customs Enforcement to submit names and addresses of people it suspects of living in the country illegally to the IRS, which the tax agency would then cross-reference and confirm, the person said.

Tax information has generally been closely held within the IRS, and laws prohibit improper disclosure of taxpayer information.

This ignores, of course, things like when IRS contractor Charles Littlejohn deliberately leaked President Trump’s tax returns for the past two decades or so, along with those of 405,000 others to whose “excessive” incomes he objected.

The IRS has encouraged undocumented migrants to file taxes, a process that includes providing the agency with their addresses, employers and earnings.

CNN reported earlier this year that DHS had circulated a draft memo to the IRS that represented a sweeping request for information about suspected undocumented immigrants, including the home addresses of several hundred thousand individuals who paid federal taxes based on their individual taxpayer identification numbers, according to a source with direct knowledge of the document.

Privacy experts say that would be a violation of the strict disclosure laws that the IRS operates under which prohibit the release of tax information by an IRS employee.

The draft the person described Sunday appears to be a narrower version of the earlier draft. Under the current iteration, the IRS would confirm migrants’ addresses rather than provide the information to ICE.

Still, it would amount to a major shift by the agency. Requests would need to be submitted by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem or acting ICE director Todd Lyons, and must include the name and address of the taxpayer, and the date of their removal order, which would allow the IRS to confirm the information.

Two immigrant rights groups in Chicago sued the Treasury Department and IRS earlier this month and asked a judge to block the agency from sharing taxpayers’ identifying information with ICE or DHS, as Trump pushes for more deportations.

The groups claimed federal law “forbids” the IRS from giving this data to immigration authorities, because ICE and DHS aren’t listed as exceptions to the confidentiality rules in the tax code.

Posted by:NoMoreBS

#4 ^ Yeah, that's gonna be tough to work out.

Sheriff accused of gunning down magistrate in his chambers reveals his defense

Posted by: Skidmark 2025-03-24 16:27

#3 Pass a law that any judge who is blocking investigations of crimes or corruption, immediately becomes party to the crimes and or corruptions and if found guilty of interference, based on their attempt to block and depending on the crimes investigated, punished by death or 25 years to life, fines of 1 billion dollars and are barred for life from being a judge, lawyer or hold elected office. If the investigation involves foreign parties, if not sentenced to death, forfeit citizenship permanently. Any judge attempting to rule this law unconstitutional will be summarily executed by their baliff, who will be paid a bounty of 20 million dollars.

Posted by: Silentbrick 2025-03-24 14:41

#2 Again, we see the Liberals, Democrats

And then there are the cupcakes.

Posted by: Skidmark 2025-03-24 10:04

#1
Again, we see the Liberals, Democrats, and the DC Swamp using the Federal Judges that they placed on the bench, to block investigations into their Illegal doings.

How about an annual Juridical review of all Federal Judges?

A review that insures ALL JUDGES are following the actual Legal processes and not supporting Political or Personal LawFare?

Because, IF any Judge is not ruling based on the US Constitution, written LAW and its established legal history. That judge should be quickly removed from the bench.

Plus, they should face criminal charges and all cases for that period reviewed for proper due process.

Posted by: NN2N1 2025-03-24 06:56

00:01