[Twitchy]
"that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out."
48 hour rule I suppose...
| Related from Anomalous Sources in comments yesterday, Gateway Pundit’s take on the story: |
Former Clinton Advisor Calls For Internal Investigation Into ABC for Rigging Presidential Debate Against Trump (VIDEO)
Former Clinton advisor Mark Penn called for an investigation into ABC News for rigging the presidential debate against Trump.
Kamala Harris has a close friendship with ABC’s bosses.
The debate moderator, Linsey Davis, was also Kamala Harris’s sorority sister.
This was never disclosed by the network.
… "I actually think they should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm. I don't know how much of this was planned in advance," Penn said to
@jsolomonReports
"I don't know what they told the Harris campaign."
"I think the day after, suspicion here is really quite high, and I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate."
"I think the situation demands nothing less than that."
Meme of current state of the fragile, near-gone Union
[X]
|