You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
BREAKING: Jack Smith Brings ANOTHER Indictment Against Trump
2024-08-27
[PJMedia] Here we go again. On Tuesday afternoon, special counsel Jack Smith filed a new indictment against Trump related to alleged interference in the 2020 election.
Filing indictments against President Trump is what he was hired to do: with great fanfare, keep throwing spaghetti against the wall in the hope that some of it will stick long enough to prevent Trump from winning the election in November.
"Today, a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned a superseding indictment, ECF No. 226, charging the defendant with the same criminal offenses that were charged in the original indictment," Smith wrote in a filing notice. "The superseding indictment, which was presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in this case, reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions in Trump v. United States."

According to the Justice Department website, "If an indictment is dismissed because of legal defect or grand jury irregularity, the government may return a new indictment within six months of the date of dismissal or within the original limitation period (whichever is later). After the original limitation period has expired, a superseding indictment may narrow, but not broaden, the charges made in the original indictment."

The narrowed indictment reflects last month's Supreme Court ruling that granted presidents wide immunity from prosecution for actions taken while in office. That ruling sent the case back to the lower court for adjudication.

Among other things, the new indictment removes the charge that Trump sought to use the Department of Justice to overturn the election—something the Supreme Court explicitly singled out in Trump v. United States.

"Because the President cannot be prosecuted for conduct within his exclusive constitutional authority, Trump is absolutely immune from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his discussions with Justice Department officials," the justices wrote.

According to Smith, "The Government does not oppose waiver of the defendant’s appearance for arraignment on the superseding indictment. As this Court directed, ECF No. 197, the Government will confer with the defense and make a joint proposal, to the extent possible, regarding pretrial litigation in the status report due Friday."
How is this fucker still drawing breath, let alone a paycheck?
He is a creature of the Deep State, which protects its own.
Related:
Jack Smith 08/24/2024 Jack Smith Surrenders: Special Counsel Will Not Seek Expedited Hearings in Donald Trump Case
Jack Smith 08/18/2024 Left-wing Washington Post slams Harris' price-gouging crackdown
Jack Smith 08/13/2024 Trump plans to SUE Justice Department for $100M over Mar-a-Lago classified documents raid

Posted by:DarthVader

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2024-08-27 20:40  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2024-08-27 19:37  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2024-08-27 19:28  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 Pan   2024-08-27 19:11  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 Pan   2024-08-27 19:10  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lord Garth    2024-08-27 18:53  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: NN2N1   2024-08-27 18:45  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Silentbrick   2024-08-27 18:31  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-08-27 18:28  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Grom the Reflective   2024-08-27 17:47  

00:00