BLUF:[PJ] But why did Barakat want to carry out a "mass shooting event"? The Star Tribune says that "the motive for his actions remains unclear." Mac Schneider, U.S. attorney for the district of North Dakota, said this past Friday that "if there was clear evidence of motive we would share it." North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley added that "the shooting was not motivated by religious beliefs."
Maybe not, but there is an extremely odd detail in the Star Tribune report: "Wrigley said a federal ’guardian report’ was made some years back" about Barakat, "but it was not about a threat of violence. Schneider described a Guardian report as a way for the public to ’engage local law enforcement.’"
That’s not exactly a full or honest description of what a Guardian report really is. As Twitter user ThunderB, who has been following this case closely and has an abundance of useful information on his or her Twitter page, points out, the Guardian system is officially "The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Terrorist Threat and Suspicious Incident Tracking System." In this context, a "suspicious incident" is clearly terror-related: "Shortly after the September 11 terrorist attacks, three FBI field offices began using an application called the Terrorist Activity Reporting System to track and monitor terrorist threats and suspicious incidents."
What was in the Guardian report about Mohamad Barakat? Why isn’t the report being revealed now? Would it reveal that officials have been lying about his not being on their radar, and demonstrate their failure to stop yet another jihadi as they intensify their hunt for "right-wing extremists," that is, their efforts to stigmatize and criminalize legitimate political dissent?
Emphasis added.