You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
A nuclear attack would most likely target one of these 6 US cities � but an expert says none of them are prepared
2023-01-02
[INSIDER] The chance that a nuclear bomb would strike a US city is slim, but nuclear experts say it's not out of the question.

A nuclear attack in a large metropolitan area is one of the 15 disaster scenarios for which the US Federal Emergency Management Agency has an emergency strategy. The agency's plan involves deploying first responders, providing immediate shelter for evacuees, and decontaminating victims who have been exposed to radiation.

For everyday citizens, FEMA has some simple advice: Get inside, stay inside, and stay tuned.

The six urban areas that Redlener thinks are the most likely targets of a nuclear attack: New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, DC.
But according to Irwin Redlener, a public-health expert at Columbia University who specializes in disaster preparedness, these federal guidelines aren't enough to prepare a city for a nuclear attack.

"There isn't a single jurisdiction in America that has anything approaching an adequate plan to deal with a nuclear detonation," he said.

That includes the six urban areas that Redlener thinks are the most likely targets of a nuclear attack: New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, DC.
I’m not living in any of them — that seems a good start.
These cities are not only some of the largest and densest in the country, but home to critical infrastructure (like energy plants, financial hubs, government facilities, and wireless transmission systems) that are vital to US security.

Each city has an emergency-management website that informs citizens about what to do in a crisis, but most of those sites (except for LA and New York) don't directly mention a nuclear attack. That makes it difficult for residents to learn how to protect themselves if a bomb were to hit one of those cities.

"It would not be the end of life as we know it," Redlener said of that scenario. "It would just be a horrific, catastrophic disaster with many, many unknown and cascading consequences."
Posted by:Besoeker

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-01-02 16:21  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-01-02 15:51  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Angase Schwarzeneggar4088   2023-01-02 15:44  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2023-01-02 15:30  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2023-01-02 13:05  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-01-02 12:52  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: magpie   2023-01-02 12:32  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2023-01-02 11:35  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-01-02 09:37  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2023-01-02 09:12  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2023-01-02 08:52  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-01-02 07:05  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-01-02 06:58  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: NN2N1   2023-01-02 06:57  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Waldemar the Limber5043   2023-01-02 02:24  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Gromble Dribble4342   2023-01-02 01:14  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Titus Sninelet5461   2023-01-02 00:36  

00:00