You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Congress implies UFOs have non-human origins
2022-08-23
[HILL] In Congress, where legislation is drafted, debated and enacted, clear and concise definitions are of paramount importance. As military aircrews increasingly encounter unidentified flying objects (UFOs), lawmakers recently made several striking revisions to the definition of "UFO." Key among them: The explosive implication that some UFOs have non-human origins.

As first reported by researcher Douglas Johnson, a draft bill approved unanimously by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence rebrands UFOs as "unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena." Expanding the definition to include objects in space and under the oceans significantly broadens the scope of a muscular new office tasked by Congress with investigating UFOs.

The revised definition of "UFO" also includes "transmedium" objects which, according to lawmakers, "transition between space and the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water."

In short, members of a key national security-focused committee believe that objects of unknown origin are demonstrating remarkably advanced technology by moving seamlessly between space, air and water. A report accompanying the legislation notes that "transmedium threats to United States national security are expanding exponentially."

It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence. Perhaps members have seen the classified sensor data that prompted former President Trump’s director of national intelligence to state that UFOs exhibit "technologies that we don’t have [and] that we are not capable of defending against" (among several other eyebrow-raising comments).

Most strikingly, Congress’s new definition of "UFO" excludes "man-made" objects.
Posted by:Besoeker

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2022-08-23 23:23  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: newc   2022-08-23 23:05  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 3dc   2022-08-23 23:02  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: magpie   2022-08-23 21:14  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shosh Platypus1744   2022-08-23 19:16  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Matt   2022-08-23 19:13  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mercutio   2022-08-23 19:02  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2022-08-23 18:09  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-08-23 16:59  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Matt   2022-08-23 12:17  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mercutio   2022-08-23 10:01  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2022-08-23 09:35  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-08-23 00:51  

00:00