Submit your comments on this article |
Government Corruption |
Andrew C. McCarthy: Seditious Conspiracy Is the Wrong Charge in the Capitol-Riot Prosecutions |
2022-01-16 |
![]() Ignoring Mr. McCarthy’s repeated insistence that Donald Trump is an evil lying liar and that Joe Biden won fair and square, ignoring his ignoring of the part the FBI’s many informants and agents provocateur played in the events of the day, he makes a useful point about the January 6 prosecutions. Select paragraphs: NationalReview] Two elements are indispensable to the crime of seditious conspiracy. First, there must be an agreement to use force, as opposed to protesting peacefully — even if rambunctiously. Second is the concept of levying war against the United States or opposing the lawful authority of the United States. Now that the Justice Department has been goaded into charging members of the Oath Keepers with seditious conspiracy for their participation in the Capitol riot, prosecutors may find that these elements pose insuperable challenges to their case.The indictment filed Thursday necessitates revisiting this subject. It does not, however, change what I’ve already said about it, back in June: The actions of then-president Donald Trump ...Perhaps no man has ever had as much fun being president of the US... before and during the riot undermine seditious-conspiracy charges. |
Posted by:trailing wife |
#8 American Stasi |
Posted by: Merrick Ferret 2022-01-16 22:27 |
#7 Increasingly clear they plan to use the process as the punishment and the example to intimidate others. The have weaponised our federal justice system to incite fear in citizens exercising their constitutional rights. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2022-01-16 20:56 |
#6 Ahhh, but if their defense is "Trump made me do it", then the Dem Congress will try to ban Trump forever. So I like #5 defense. |
Posted by: Bobby 2022-01-16 14:26 |
#5 It appears to me the Oath Keepers were prepared to deliver weapons to protestors if the feds opened fire on the protestors. This is consistent with the Oath Keepers' mission and, IMHO, the moral thing to do. As that never happened -- excepting the cold blooded murder of Ashli Babbit -- the Oath Keepers were just observers, ensuring the feds didn't violate THEIR oaths en masse. |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2022-01-16 11:44 |
#4 an indictment is not a report. It is not about what Attorney General Merrick What do you mean 'we,' Paleface? Facts are whatever Da Ferret deems truth. Re-education camp for this running dog! |
Posted by: Merrick Ferret 2022-01-16 10:30 |
#3 Andy Mac shredded his credibility years ago when he tried to defend the FB-eye while exposing the Russia Hoax. He's another D.C. area conservative cuck who's terrified that his livelihood and his family will be targeted if he's seen to be in the Orange Man's camp. |
Posted by: Merrick Ferret 2022-01-16 10:27 |
#2 Note that Andy McCarthy has constantly defended the professionalism, ethics, and integrity of the DOJ and FBI. 'Nuff said. |
Posted by: Frank G 2022-01-16 07:35 |
#1 The Times of Israel gives us Ay Pee’s view through a different filter: Legal risks in sedition conspiracy charge for ‘Oath Keepers’ who stormed Capitol Experts say the rarely used charge is hard to prove, but the case is strong; far-right militia accused of preparing to deliver arms to members on January 6, if need arose. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2022-01-16 03:39 |