Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
By Boris Rozhin
[ColonelCassad] Oh, these are notable threats. The US threatens that "if Russia invades Ukraine," then the US will organize "financial isolation of Russia" and "will increase the contingent of troops in countries on the border of Russia."
Everything is fine here.
1. Constant reservations "if Russia invades" seem to say that Russia did not invade Ukraine, although Ukrainian propaganda squeals about "repelling Russian aggression."
2. Interestingly, the effectiveness of "financial isolation" of Russia will be as effective as the "diplomatic isolation" promised by Obama? The promised "torn apart" economy also did not come.
3. And the very juice - the United States is threatening Russia that it will send troops not to Ukraine, but to the territory of conditional Poland, the Baltic states, Romania, Bulgaria, etc. That is, if the RF Armed Forces take control of the whole of Ukraine, then the United States threatens that the US and NATO troops near the borders of the Russian Federation will increase. At the same time, the NATO grouping in these countries is growing anyway.
These are very wonderful threats and guarantees, which reflect the attitude of the United States towards Ukraine as an instrument that they want to use profitably for themselves, but do not want to enter a direct war with the Russian Federation for the sake of Ukraine.
Therefore, there is a "barrier."
Therefore, the Biden administration in public statements assures that the United States does not want a direct war with the Russian Federation in Ukraine.
Therefore, the troops are threatening to be deployed outside Ukraine. To prevent the formation of a mechanism for launching a direct war, with obligations undesirable for the United States. Which, of course, does not negate the simple fact that Washington will try to play the Ukrainian card in a way favorable to itself.
|