You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Comments From The Activist Ginsburg Bench - 'Equal Rights Amendment Would Herald Perfection'
2020-02-11
Dream weaving.
[The Hill] Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Monday the U.S. still needs an Equal Rights Amendment, days before the House is set to decide whether to remove the deadline to ratify the amendment.

Ginsburg spoke at a Georgetown Law School event Monday almost 100 years after women voted in their first presidential election. The justice mentioned how the National Women’s Party viewed the 19th Amendment that gave women the right to vote as "the beginning" after courts interpreted the amendment to only apply to voting rights.

"Their idea was the 19th Amendment was the beginning, but women should have equality in all fields of human endeavor, so we needed an Equal Rights Amendment," she said. "And I think, at least in my view, we still do."

She said the U.S. would be "more perfect" if "our fundamental instrument of government" included a statement designating men and women of equal citizenship statures.

"My notion was I would like to show my granddaughters that the equal citizenship stature of men and women is a fundamental human right," she said. "It should be right up there with free speech freedom of religion and discrimination based on race, national origin."

Ginsburg’s comments come as the House plans to vote on legislation to get rid of the deadline to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment on Friday. The vote was scheduled after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify the amendment last month, decades after the deadline.

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has hinted he isn’t in support of the amendment.
In other words, House Democrats are posturing for the rubes again — it’ll never get past the Senate even if the thing hadn’t expired long since.But if it really is that important to the Democrats, they can try starting the whole thing from scratch, either in both houses of Congress or a Constitutional convention of the states, just like they did the first time.
Related:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 2019-12-20 Revealing the funny side of the ‘Mossad'
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 2019-12-20 New York State providing $10 million to protect religious institutions
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 2019-12-07 U.S. Justice Ginsburg puts temporary hold on Trump financial records dispute
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: magpie   2020-02-11 20:07  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AlanC   2020-02-11 13:00  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-02-11 07:50  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cesare   2020-02-11 07:47  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-02-11 06:56  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2020-02-11 05:57  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-02-11 03:02  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lex   2020-02-11 00:27  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-02-11 00:13  

00:00