You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
GAO says Trump administration broke law by withholding Ukraine aid
2020-01-16
Note: Main headline on front page said "Federal watchdog issues report finding Trump admin broke law by withholding Ukraine aid"
[FoxNews] The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a legal opinion on Thursday saying that President Trump's administration broke the law by withholding defense aid to Ukraine � the issue at the heart of the president's impeachment trial.

That money, $214 million which had been allocated to the Department of Defense for security assistance, was appropriated by Congress and therefore the administration did not have the right to hold it back just because it disagreed with its allocation, the opinion from the nonpartisan government watchdog said.

"Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law," the opinion said. "[The Office of Management and Budget] OMB withheld funds for a policy reason ... not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that the OMB violated the ICA [Impoundment Control Act]."

The OMB made clear Thursday, however, that it disagreed with the GAO report.

"We disagree with GAO's opinion," OMB spokesperson Rachel Semmel said. "OMB uses its apportionment authority to ensure taxpayer dollars are properly spent consistent with the President's priorities and with the law."

Further, a senior administration official said to Fox News that they believed the GAO was trying to insert itself into impeachment at a time when media attention on the matter is high.

"GAO’s findings are a pretty clear overreach as they attempt to insert themselves into the media’s controversy of the day. Further, GAO has a history of the flip-flops, reversing 40-years of precedent this year on their pocket rescission decision, they were also forced to reverse a legally faulty opinion when they opposed the reimbursement of federal employee travel costs. In their rush to insert themselves in the impeachment narrative, maybe they’ll have to reverse their opinion again."
More at link!
Posted by:Seeking Cure For Ignorance

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ruprecht   2020-01-16 23:30  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bill Borgia6417   2020-01-16 21:11  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Varmint Splat1454   2020-01-16 18:55  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-01-16 17:35  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lex   2020-01-16 17:30  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DarthVader   2020-01-16 17:26  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2020-01-16 16:35  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: magpie   2020-01-16 15:42  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: newc   2020-01-16 15:38  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2020-01-16 15:13  

00:00