You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Mueller Says He Is ‘Not Familiar’ With Fusion GPS, The Firm Behind The Steele Dossier
2019-07-25
[DAILYCALLER]

And courtesy of Angaiting Thising6508:
Twitter Reacts To Mueller Claim He's 'Not Familiar' with Fusion GPS

[PJMedia] You'd have to be living under a rock to not know what Fusion GPS is. But, if you're Robert Mueller, who ran a two-year $25 million investigation into Russian collusion, apparently you have no idea.

Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH): "When you talk about the firm that produced the Steele [dossier], the name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS. Is that correct?"

Robert Mueller: "I'm not familiar ... with that"

Chabot: "It's not a trick question. It was Fusion GPS" pic.twitter.com/4WA0lhKc3x
‐ Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) July 24, 2019

Robert Mueller says he didn’t clear ‘problematic’ Trump in stuttering hearings that fail to deliver knockout punch

[NYDAILYNEWS] A stone-faced Robert Mueller testified before Congress on Wednesday that President Trump could very well be criminally prosecuted once he’s out of office and slammed the president’s “problematic” cheerleading of Russian interference in American elections.

In six hours of stilted and at times stuttering testimony before two House committees, the square-jawed former special counsel recounted that his team of investigators unearthed plenty of evidence that the president tried to obstruct his 22-month probe of Russia’s pro-Trump meddling in the 2016 election.

“The president was not exculpated,” Mueller declared near the start of his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee.

Asked if he had exonerated Trump as the president has repeatedly claimed, Mueller bluntly replied: “No.”

Mueller also offered the shocking suggestion that Trump could be indicted for obstruction of justice when he’s no longer president. “Yes,” he said, adding it would be up to future federal prosecutors to decide.
Posted by:Fred

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gorb   2019-07-25 16:09  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Woodrow   2019-07-25 13:00  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ruprecht   2019-07-25 10:39  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2019-07-25 10:15  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-07-25 09:57  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-07-25 08:02  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mercutio   2019-07-25 07:50  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed in texas   2019-07-25 05:16  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phaick Uneretle6310   2019-07-25 00:18  

00:01