Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
The Moral Of The Mueller Inquisition |
2019-04-19 |
It was "beyond a shadow of a doubt [that Trump] sought to...collude with the Russian government...to undermine and influence our elections," seconded wonder boy Beto O’Rourke. And that’s just a humdrum smattering of the folly force-fed to Americans for the two years of the Mueller Inquisition, from "respectable" TV megaphones, including legions of Never Trump Republicans. The same characters, in their many interchangeable iterations, will remind you that the omniscient Mueller had equivocated over the matter of obstruction of justice. Over this, the second part of his eponymous report, Mueller declined to prosecute Trump. The first part of Robert Mueller’s report "cleared Donald Trump of having conspired with Russia." |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#3 Really? They knew that if any prosecutor more competent than Elmer Fudd would dig and eventually make the same decisions. They were betting on Mueller being one of theirs and the staff of Clintonistas convoluting their way to a conclusion that fit their narrative. Personally, I think Mueller knew going it that the collusion thing was complete BS but he did what any doctor would do, order a bazillion tests to show thoroughness and called it a day. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom 2019-04-19 16:55 |
#2 I bet Brennan and others would have taken a different angle the last two years if they'd known Mueller's report would come out so soon and so clearly exonerate Trump. Two years of cocktail parties seems a sad trade-off for trashing your career and reputation forever. |
Posted by: rschwarz 2019-04-19 14:55 |
#1 The Moral Of The Mueller Inquisition Bring back the spoils system? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2019-04-19 12:08 |