You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Mystery Russian satellite's behaviour raises alarm in US
2018-08-16
[BBC] A mysterious Russian satellite displaying "very abnormal behaviour" has raised alarm in the US, according to a State Department official. "We don't know for certain what it is and there is no way to verify it," said assistant secretary Yleem Poblete at a conference in Switzerland on 14 August. She voiced fears that it was impossible to say if the object may be a weapon.

Russia has dismissed the comments as "unfounded, slanderous accusations based on suspicions".

The satellite in question was launched in October last year.

"[The satellite's] behaviour on-orbit was inconsistent with anything seen before from on-orbit inspection or space situational awareness capabilities, including other Russian inspection satellite activities," Ms Poblete told the conference on disarmament in Switzerland. "Russian intentions with respect to this satellite are unclear and are obviously a very troubling development," she added, citing recent comments made by the commander of Russia's Space Forces, who said adopting "new prototypes of weapons" was a key objective for the force. Ms Poblete said that the US had "serious concerns" that Russia was developing anti-satellite weapons.

Space weapons may be designed to cause damage in more subtle ways than traditional weapons like guns, which could cause a lot of debris in orbit, explained Alexandra Stickings, a research analyst at the Royal United Services Institute. "[Such weapons may include] lasers or microwave frequencies that could just stop [a satellite] working for a time, either disable it permanently without destroying it or disrupt it via jamming," she said.

But it was difficult to know what technology is available because so much information on space-based capabilities is classified, she added. She also said it would be very difficult to prove that any event causing interference in space was an intentional, hostile action by a specific nation state.
Posted by:Ulanter Angamp3837

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-08-16 11:29  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2018-08-16 10:29  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Snoluting Phomoth8901   2018-08-16 09:29  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed in texas   2018-08-16 08:34  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-08-16 05:05  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ebbavirt Clunk4147   2018-08-16 04:41  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: newc   2018-08-16 00:54  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Raj   2018-08-16 00:28  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: magpie   2018-08-16 00:17  

00:00