You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Trump exceeded authority with travel ban, says court
2017-12-25
More on this story from yesterday.
[DAWN] HONOLULU: A US federal appeals court panel ruled that President Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States...
once again exceeded the scope of his authority with his latest travel ban, but the judges on the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals put their decision on hold pending review by the US Supreme Court, meaning the ban involving six majority Moslem countries will remain in effect.

The 77-page ruling released late Friday says Trump’s proclamation makes no finding whatsoever that simply being from one of the countries cited in the ban makes someone a security risk.

Hawaii, which is suing to stop the ban, has argued that it will be harmful because families will be separated and university recruitment will be hampered.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court lifted temporary lower court orders that had prevented the latest ban from taking effect.

The status quo was maintained when the 9th Circuit stayed its decision, said Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.

The ruling was unusual, but it’s a unique case, he said, noting the Supreme Court has not set argument dates because it has not yet decided to grant an appeal.

"Given the shockingly rapid volley of executive actions and court decisions, this is surely just the latest in a long series of battles to come."

Mary Fan, a University of Washington law school professor, said about immigration ban litigation.

The judges focused on whether Trump had made a required finding that the entry of people affected by the ban would be detrimental to US interests.

Posted by:Fred

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Herb Smith2864   2017-12-25 19:39  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-12-25 15:02  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-12-25 13:32  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: P2kontheroad   2017-12-25 13:21  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Injun Bucket8891   2017-12-25 12:12  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DarthVader   2017-12-25 10:05  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2017-12-25 08:12  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-12-25 06:31  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: newc   2017-12-25 03:01  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2017-12-25 00:54  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ulaigum Ebbineng7056   2017-12-25 00:53  

00:00