You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers'
2017-02-25
h/t Instapundit
...From his lab at the University of Virginia's Centre for Open Science, immunologist Dr Tim Errington runs The Reproducibility Project, which attempted to repeat the findings reported in five landmark cancer studies.

"The idea here is to take a bunch of experiments and to try and do the exact same thing to see if we can get the same results."

You could be forgiven for thinking that should be easy. Experiments are supposed to be replicable.

The authors should have done it themselves before publication, and all you have to do is read the methods section in the paper and follow the instructions.
Sadly nothing, it seems, could be further from the truth.

After meticulous research involving painstaking attention to detail over several years (the project was launched in 2011), the team was able to confirm only two of the original studies' findings.
Long live collegiality and affirmative action!
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2017-02-25 19:58  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AlanC   2017-02-25 14:42  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2017-02-25 14:17  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-02-25 13:14  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2017-02-25 13:04  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pappy   2017-02-25 12:10  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DarthVader   2017-02-25 10:44  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-02-25 08:21  

00:00