You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
New FOIA release: Obama admin knew immediately Benghazi was "direct breaching" terror attack, not "under cover of protest"
2017-02-17
[Hot Air] Perhaps the subject of the terror attack on the US consulate in Benghazi will become more academic than political after the 2016 election denied Hillary Clinton the presidency. For now, though, documents continue to emerge that contradict the narrative created by Hillary and the Barack Obama White House about the nature of the attack. Yesterday, Judicial Watch received 54 more pages from its FOIA lawsuits and came across a bombshell buried in them. Notes of a State Department briefing for Congressional aides on the day after the attack show Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy acknowledging that the attack was not a protest gone bad, or even an attack under the cover of protest. It was, Kennedy told the Congressional aides, "a direct breaching attack":

Judicial Watch today released 54 pages of new State Department documents, including a transcript of a September 12 2012, telephone conference call with congressional staffers in which then-Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy admitted that the deadly terrorist assault on the Benghazi Consulate was not "under cover of protest," but was, in fact, "a direct breaching attack."

The exchange comes late in the conversation with Robert Carter, an aide to Rep. Michael C. Burgess (R-TX). Carter asks Kennedy directly whether this involved a protest, and Kennedy says no:
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-02-17 17:51  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2017-02-17 13:42  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2017-02-17 13:05  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pappy   2017-02-17 12:32  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-02-17 10:32  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-02-17 10:22  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DarthVader   2017-02-17 09:23  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-02-17 08:58  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2017-02-17 07:39  

00:00