You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
How the Kremlin Hacked Its Way Into a Crisis
2016-10-13
Last Friday the U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) publicly named the Russian government for directing "the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations." It claimed that the disclosures of hacked emails "on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process", while "only Russia’s most senior officials could have authorized these activities."

President Vladimir Putin in a recent interview to Bloomberg denied that Russia on a state level had anything to do with the email hacks, but his claim that "the important thing is the content that was given to the public, and not the search for who did it" suggested more than a cursory knowledge of the matter. His further claim that the Russian government did not possess the kind of sophisticated sense of U.S. domestic politics to pull off such a tricky game sounded lame. The Russian Foreign Ministry maintains a granular understanding of the intricate details of U.S. presidential and party politics. The Russian Embassy in Washington keeps about a dozen diplomats on the beat. It is not, as some claim, that the Russians suddenly discovered the DNC last year.

While the publicly available evidence linking Russian intelligence to the hacks is inconclusive and may even suggest a false flag operation to entangle Moscow in a brawl with Washington, the U.S. Intelligence Community had a high degree of confidence in Russian involvement even in July and the fact that they publicly named Russian intelligence as perpetrators suggests that they have definitive proof.
'The greatest threat to the U.S. is Russia.' And the Obama response was ?
Posted by:Pappy

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2016-10-13 19:30  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rjschwarz   2016-10-13 16:45  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-10-13 16:23  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2016-10-13 13:41  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2016-10-13 12:15  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2016-10-13 11:50  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-10-13 11:30  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-10-13 09:11  

00:00