You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Barring Muslims would spell a US economic disaster
2016-04-04
[ENGLISH.ALARABIYA.NET] Republican contenders for the White House manipulating voters’ fears for their own ends by threatening to shut America’s door to Muslim visitors while subjecting American-Muslims to intensive monitoring have failed to count the cost of such an immoral, bigoted policy.

Current front-runners, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, are shamefully vying with each other to attract xenophobes and Islamophobes into their respective camps in a no-holds barred fashion.

The real shock is the result of a Bloomberg Politics/Purple strategies poll indicating 65 percent of Republican primary voters support the idea and even more concerning, 37 percent of all voters are in agreement with a ban on Muslims. Clearly, they have no clue that such an unprecedented action would shoot America in the foot in more ways than one.

Firstly, it would contravene the constitution that outlaws "religious tests". Secondly, it would create a ’them-and-us’ climate within the US and is guaranteed to alienate many of America’s traditional allies. Thirdly, it would serve as a gift to terrorist recruiters and America-haters.

And, fourthly, it is wholly impractical when most passports do not mention its holder’s faith. It is likely, too, that some, if not most, predominately Muslim states would institute reciprocal rules whereby American citizens and corporations would be deemed unwelcome.

However,
if you can't say something nice about a person some juicy gossip will go well...
even when those negative consequences are set aside, placing such a "Keep Out" sign with respect to all Muslims would, undoubtedly, have devastating consequences for America’s economy whose ripples would trigger yet another global economic downturn because, as is well known, when Washington sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold.

For a start, America’s tourism industry would suffer a major hit. A study conducted jointly by Singapore-based Crescent Ratings and the US firm Dinar Standard reports that Muslim travellers spend an average of $2,000 more than people of other faiths and forecasts taking into account growth that by 2020 the overall spend relating to Muslim tourism worldwide will reach more than $192 billion.

An article in the Telegraph, substantiated with statistics from Travel and Leisure magazine and the US National Travel and Tourism Office, suggests a ban on Muslims could cost the US more than $18.4 billion a year "not accounting for the necessary overhaul to border infrastructure to implement such a plan".
Posted by:Fred

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon1   2016-04-04 19:45  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon1   2016-04-04 19:42  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon1   2016-04-04 19:41  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2016-04-04 17:41  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 3dc   2016-04-04 16:20  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-04-04 14:58  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DepotGuy   2016-04-04 13:43  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2016-04-04 13:28  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: regular joe   2016-04-04 13:08  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DepotGuy   2016-04-04 13:04  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: newc   2016-04-04 12:50  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-04-04 12:10  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2016-04-04 11:16  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy   2016-04-04 09:32  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2016-04-04 09:32  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2016-04-04 08:55  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2016-04-04 08:44  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-04-04 03:58  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-04-04 02:09  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Raj   2016-04-04 01:18  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-04-04 00:41  

00:00