You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Krauthammer: The Iran deal - Anatomy of a disaster
2015-04-10
[WAPO] It was but a year and a half ago that the Champ endorsed the objective of abolition when he said that Iran's heavily fortified Fordow nuclear facility, its plutonium-producing heavy-water reactor and its advanced centrifuges were all unnecessary for a civilian nuclear program. The logic was clear: Since Iran was claiming to be pursuing an exclusively civilian program, these would have to go.

Yet under the deal the Champ is now trying to sell, not one of these is to be dismantled. Indeed, Iran's entire nuclear infrastructure is kept intact, just frozen or repurposed for the length of the deal (about a decade). Thus Fordow's centrifuges will keep spinning. They will now be fed xenon, zinc and germanium instead of uranium. But that means they remain ready at any time to revert from the world's most heavily (indeed comically) fortified medical isotope facility to a bomb-making factory.

And upon the expiration of the deal, conceded the Champ Monday on NPR, Iran's breakout time to a nuclear bomb will be "almost down to zero," i.e., it will be able to produce nuclear weapons at will and without delay.

And then there's cheating. Not to worry, says the Champ. We have guarantees of compliance: "unprecedented inspections" and "snapback" sanctions.

The inspection promises are a farce. We haven't even held the Iranians to their current obligation to come clean with the International Atomic Energy Agency on their previous nuclear activities. The IAEA charges Iran with stonewalling on 11 of 12 issues.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-04-10 22:43  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Vernal Spavins7649   2015-04-10 21:09  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2015-04-10 20:57  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-04-10 15:52  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2015-04-10 15:41  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-04-10 15:39  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2015-04-10 13:51  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-04-10 12:07  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2015-04-10 12:04  

00:00