[Kanuk Free Press] Just wondering here: If it's "treason" to inform a terrorist regime that they can't make a treaty with a U.S. president who ignores his obligation to submit the treaty for ratification, what is it when the Secretary of State and the president exchange e-mails on a non-secure, private e-mail server that thus exposes the president's e-mail address (and whatever the two of them discussed) to hacker?And what is it when the president lies and said it never happened, and that he knew nothing about it? Because that's what he did, as the White House now admits.
Nice venue for leaking classified documents to foreign source hackers I'd say. Of course the Beest never actually 'sent' any classified documents.