You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Gawker: Hillary's shoddy private e-mail security is a potential national security disaster
2015-03-06
[Hot Air.com] We already knew it was bad. Not until you read this will you understand how bad. In fact, I debated with myself whether to even include the word "potential" in the headline. The reason it's there is because cybersecurity experts can't say for an absolute fact that foreign governments infiltrated her server. All they can say is that it's a virtual certainty given how high a priority she is for enemy hackers and how clumsy her defenses were. It's like a business owner knowing that his store is being cased and choosing to leave the vault unlocked anyway.

You need to read it all to appreciate the extent of the failure. The threshold problem with using private e-mail is that your own cybersecurity is only as good as the company you're using. If hackers know a way into a commercial server -- and Hillary's e-mail apparently used three different servers -- then they have a way into your account potentially. That's not a major problem for average people but it's huge when the target is someone being watched by the most sophisticated cyber outfits in the world. Instead of conducting State Department business behind one very well fortified door, i.e. the federal government's, Hillary placed it behind three less fortified ones. The only reason to do that is if she was more worried about the American public knowing what she was doing than, say, China knowing.

But even that doesn't fully explain the security lapse. If you're going to hide behind three less fortified doors, you should at least want to make sure those doors are as fortified as possible. Hillary didn't:
Posted by:Besoeker

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-03-06 22:45  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2015-03-06 22:19  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Albert Thravins4110   2015-03-06 20:25  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-03-06 20:12  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed in texas   2015-03-06 19:04  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: KBK   2015-03-06 16:14  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Black Bart Brown1628   2015-03-06 15:35  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Warthog   2015-03-06 15:22  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-03-06 12:44  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: frozen al   2015-03-06 12:34  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mossomo   2015-03-06 11:58  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-03-06 11:31  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-03-06 11:24  

00:00