| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Introducing... The Hybrid Bradley? |
| 2013-05-29 |
tu3031, in a moment of fine snark, called this in a comment thread a few years ago. You magnificent bastard!Next year, the U.S. Army is expected to choose a larger tank*--a ground combat vehicle (GCV), to be specific--to replace its Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle, which has been in service since 1981. If the army accepts one contractor's proposal, its armored brigades could be relying heavily on a tank with a hybrid engine for several decades. I haven't seen an idea this dumb since Microsoft Bob... |
| Posted by:Raj |
| #21 |
| Posted by: KBK 2013-05-29 20:12 |
| #20 |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2013-05-29 14:54 |
| #19 |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2013-05-29 14:40 |
| #18 |
| Posted by: Vinegar Lumplump7734 2013-05-29 14:38 |
| #17 |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2013-05-29 14:34 |
| #16 |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2013-05-29 13:39 |
| #15 |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2013-05-29 13:27 |
| #14 |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2013-05-29 13:22 |
| #13 |
| Posted by: Nguard 2013-05-29 12:50 |
| #12 |
| Posted by: Frozen Al 2013-05-29 12:42 |
| #11 |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2013-05-29 12:28 |
| #10 |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2013-05-29 12:18 |
| #9 |
| Posted by: SteveS 2013-05-29 12:02 |
| #8 |
| Posted by: rammer 2013-05-29 12:01 |
| #7 |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2013-05-29 11:35 |
| #6 |
| Posted by: newc 2013-05-29 11:25 |
| #5 |
| Posted by: Mitch H. 2013-05-29 09:56 |
| #4 |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2013-05-29 09:34 |
| #3 |
| Posted by: Shump Ebbinesing8470 2013-05-29 05:34 |
| #2 |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2013-05-29 04:09 |
| #1 |
| Posted by: phil_b 2013-05-29 01:11 |