| Submit your comments on this article | ||||
| China-Japan-Koreas | ||||
| S. Korea should weigh departure from NPT, lawmaker says | ||||
| 2013-04-10 | ||||
WASHINGTON -- In an effort to counter North Korea's military threats, South Korea should keep all options on the table, including withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), a senior South Korean politician said Tuesday.
The seven-term lawmaker emphasized that Seoul should be given this leeway as a "law-abiding member of the global community who is threatened by a nuclear rogue state." Some in South Korea even say, he noted, the only way to solve the North Korean nuclear problem is for the country to follow the India-Pakistan example, or the case of Israel.
"It is like a member of the gun-control lobby in good-standing whose neighborhood gangster just acquired assault rifles and threatens him," Chung said. "In order to buy a gun to protect himself and his family against the gangster, he now wishes to withdraw his membership temporarily." South Korea acceded to the NPT in 1975. It has since operated nuclear reactors for non-military purposes. He reiterated calls for the U.S. to redeploy tactical nuclear weapons in Korea in order to send a political message not only to Pyongyang but also to Beijing. "North Korea, and for that matter China as well, should know that South Korea has this option if it persists in possessing nuclear weapons. Nuclear proliferation in East Asia will unfold at the invitation of North Korea endorsed by China," he said. "The question for China is 'Does it want South Korea to bring back U.S. tactical nuclear weapons or develop its own nuclear capability?" The U.S. pulled all of its tactical nuclear weapons, which can be delivered by artillery or missile, out of South Korea in 1991 as part of President George H.W. Bush's Presidential Nuclear Initiative. Chung said the international community needs to re-set its North Korea policy, adding that decades-long efforts to resolve the crisis have failed. "The story of how the global community failed to prevent an isolated, failing state from acquiring the ultimate weapon will go down in the annals of diplomatic history as one of the most spectacular and consequential failures," he claimed. Chung emphasized that it is more important to figure out North Korea's nuclear capabilities and take necessary precautions than trying to understand the intentions of its leadership. Despite his political clout, Chung's suggestions do not seem to reflect mainstream views in the South Korean political circles, which still put more emphasis on the alliance with the U.S., trusting Washington's nuclear umbrella. His calls may sound more radical than realistic, as many express worries over adverse effects to the alliance, efforts for denuclearization talks with North Korea, and Seoul's status on the global stage.
The U.S. government took a dim view of Chung's demand, saying Washington stays committed to the defense of South Korea. "The ROK (South Korea) is a committed partner and global leader on strengthening and maintaining the integrity of the NPT and the global nonproliferation regime," a State Department official told Yonhap News Agency, asked about Washington's position on Chung's views. The alliance between the two nations "is fully capable to deter, defend against, and respond to the threat posed to our allies by North Korea," the official added, requesting anonymity. "The United States remains steadfast in its commitment to the ROKÂ’s defense, including the extended deterrence provided by our conventional forces and nuclear umbrella." | ||||
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #6 |
| Posted by: rammer 2013-04-10 18:39 |
| #5 |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2013-04-10 14:43 |
| #4 |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2013-04-10 11:52 |
| #3 |
| Posted by: Water Modem 2013-04-10 09:56 |
| #2 |
| Posted by: crosspatch 2013-04-10 04:32 |
| #1 |
| Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2013-04-10 03:12 |