You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
November surprise: EPA planning major post-election anti-coal regulation
2012-11-05
President ObamaÂ’s Environmental Protection Agency has devoted an unprecedented number of bureaucrats to finalizing new anti-coal regulations that are set to be released at the end of November, according to a source inside the EPA.

More than 50 EPA staff are now crashing to finish greenhouse gas emission standards that would essentially ban all construction of new coal-fired power plants. Never before have so many EPA resources been devoted to a single regulation. The independent and non-partisan Manhattan Institute estimates that the EPAÂ’s greenhouse gas coal regulation will cost the U.S. economy $700 billion.

The rush is a major sign of panic by environmentalists inside the Obama administration. If Obama wins, the EPA would have another four full years to implement their anti-fossil fuel agenda. But if Romney wins, regulators will have a very narrow window to enact a select few costly regulations that would then be very hard for a President Romney to undo.

Environmentalists at the EPA pulled this trick before in 2000 when the Clinton administration rushed out a finding that Mercury emissions from power plants were a growing public health threat pursuant to the Clean Air Act. That finding did not regulate power plants itself, but it did force the Bush administration to begin a lengthy regulatory process. The Obama EPA has estimated that this regulation alone will cost the U.S. economy $10.9 billion a year.
Posted by:Au Auric

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DarthVader   2012-11-05 23:22  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-11-05 17:45  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2012-11-05 14:59  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Broadhead6   2012-11-05 12:32  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sherry   2012-11-05 10:43  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2012-11-05 09:10  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2012-11-05 09:06  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-11-05 08:34  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2012-11-05 07:40  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-11-05 07:30  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dale   2012-11-05 07:06  

00:00