You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Election 2012
Dem's amendment would give 29 more electoral votes to popular-vote winner
2012-10-27
[The Hill] The head of the House Democratic campaign arm this week proposed a constitutional amendment that would give the winner of the popular vote in the presidential race an additional 29 electoral votes.

Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) did not offer an explanation in the joint resolution filed in the House for why he was proposing to change the way elections in the U.S. are decided.

Under the Constitution, the candidate who wins at least 270 electoral votes wins the presidency, regardless of the popular vote.

The prospect of a split between the popular vote and the Electoral College usually provokes cries of abolishing the Electoral College completely, but rather than simplifying the process, Israel's resolution would add an additional level of intrigue to the electoral puzzle.

Swing states would retain their importance in the Electoral College, but the additional 29 delegates awarded to the popular-vote winner would fundamentally alter the focus of the campaigns. Candidates would have to target voters in states they have no chance of winning, as well as in states they have no chance of losing.
Posted by:Fred

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-10-27 16:26  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rammer   2012-10-27 16:25  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Perfesser   2012-10-27 16:16  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: European Conservative   2012-10-27 15:16  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2012-10-27 12:45  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: newc   2012-10-27 12:17  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-10-27 12:09  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2012-10-27 11:18  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-10-27 08:13  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-10-27 08:11  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Au Auric   2012-10-27 01:24  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2012-10-27 00:55  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-10-27 00:38  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2012-10-27 00:16  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rjschwarz   2012-10-27 00:14  

00:00