You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Project Gunwalker: Issa Blinks on Holder's Deadline, to No Date
2012-02-13
For nearly a year now, House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell Issa (R=CA) and Attorney General Eric Holder have locked horns over Operation Fast and Furious. Throughout this time we have seen heated exchanges between the two during Congressional hearings, watched the DOJÂ’s narrative change more than once, and wondered why Holder has thus far been allowed to dictate the speed at which the committee can investigate him.

As of late, when Holder dug in and simply refused to the turn over the documents the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed, the contest between he and Issa turned into nothing less than a battle of wills. And Issa upped the ante when he drew a line in the sand and gave Holder until 5 pm on February 9th to comply with the subpoenas or face charges of contempt of congress.

And so they squared off, and for any of you who wondered which man would blink first the answer has been revealed—Issa blinked, and gave Holder & Co. a time extension for turning over the documents.

Keep in mind, that throughout the time the back and forth has been taking place, the DOJ has given the House Oversight Committee just 6,000 documents, but theyÂ’ve provided their internal IG with 80,000 plus. The bottom line: time hasnÂ’t been the issue, rather, the refusal to comply has. Nevertheless, Issa has given in and provided Holder with more time anyway.

And to make matters worse, as of today the extension has no time limit on it.

So as it stands, Holder has from now till the cows come home to play it his way.
Posted by:Sherry

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ralphs son Johnnie   2012-02-13 22:41  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RandomJD   2012-02-13 21:51  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2012-02-13 21:09  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2012-02-13 20:31  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2012-02-13 19:58  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2012-02-13 19:03  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-02-13 18:20  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-02-13 18:11  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sherry   2012-02-13 17:20  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2012-02-13 16:32  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Chesney Spusoth9331   2012-02-13 16:21  

00:00