You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan among bottom 5 on income, wellbeing ranking
2011-11-03
[Dawn] An index that measures prosperity as a function of both income and wellbeing for 110 countries around the world has placed Pakistain fourth from the bottom, below Sudan and Yemen.

At 107, Pakistain is ahead of only Ethiopia, Zim-bob-we and the Central African Republic. In the Asia-Pacific region, it is ranked last out of 22 nations.

London-based research organization Legatum Institute released on Tuesday the 2011 Legatum Prosperity Index, in which countries are ranked in eight areas before being given an overall prosperity rank.

Nordic countries dominate the overall rankings, with Norway and Denmark bagging the top two spots and Sweden and Finland also appearing in the top 10. Others in that group include Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland
...home of the Helvetians, famous for cheese, watches, yodeling, and William Tell...
, the Netherlands and, lastly, the United States

Pakistain is listed at 86 for Entrepreneurship & Opportunity, 96 for both Economy and Health, 98 for Governance, 100 for Social Capital, 104 for Personal Freedom, 105 for Education and 109 for Safety & Security. In this last category it is preceded by Colombia and followed only by Sudan.

The numbers for Social Capital and Personal Freedom may provide some cause for scepticism. As the report itself admits, Pakistain has relatively strong social networks, and at times these have functioned as private social welfare nets. And the Personal Freedom score seems low compared to some other countries listed above Pakistain, such as Soddy Arabia, China and Syria.

. Some of the reasons listed for Pakistain's poor performance include an unstable economy with uncertain growth prospects, limited access to technology, income inequality, lack of competition and accountability in the political system, limited spending on public health, low school enrolment rates and poor quality of education, political violence, demographic pressures, and limitations on civil liberties.
Posted by:Fred

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RandomJD   2011-11-03 19:36  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2011-11-03 18:34  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shinetch Dribble8796   2011-11-03 18:32  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-11-03 16:07  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pappy   2011-11-03 16:05  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Paul   2011-11-03 13:33  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pablo   2011-11-03 13:21  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-11-03 04:34  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2011-11-03 02:28  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-11-03 02:11  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Creregum Glolump8403   2011-11-03 00:58  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Eohippus Phater7165   2011-11-03 00:25  

00:00