You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
US President Hauling Arizona Before UN Human Rights Council
2010-08-26
Via Gateway Pundit via via Free Republic
The Report is here

Apparently Barack Obama is not content to make a federal case out of his immigration feud with Arizona; he just made it an international one.

The presidents first-ever report on U.S. human rights to the UN Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material. So far, one aspect has not been reported: our petty president used the situation to bash Arizonas immigration law -- and possibly transfer jurisdiction over the law from Arizona to the UN. Throughout the report, which sounds like an Obama campaign speech, the president discusses "the original flaw" of the U.S. Constitution, Americas tolerance for slavery, and his version of our long and despicable history of discriminating against and oppressing minorities, women, homosexuals, and the handicapped. After each complaint, he addresses how he is delivering us from ourselves, patting himself on the back for such initiatives as ending "torture," promoting Affirmative Action, and passing health care legislation.

In his section on "Values and Immigration," he praised the Department of Homeland Securitys efforts to provide better medical care for detainees and increase "Alternatives To Detention" (e.g., letting them go). Then he turned to the one state that has had the temerity to stand in his way of fundamentally transforming the American electorate:

A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world. The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined.
Posted by:Sherry

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 Pan   2010-08-26 22:53  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: badanov   2010-08-26 22:26  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: HighEfficiency   2010-08-26 20:38  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Thavilet Lumumba1426   2010-08-26 20:18  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2010-08-26 19:45  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DMFD   2010-08-26 19:22  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DMFD   2010-08-26 19:13  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-08-26 19:13  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lex   2010-08-26 18:13  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2010-08-26 18:04  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-08-26 17:28  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 Pan   2010-08-26 17:13  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2010-08-26 16:52  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-08-26 16:46  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-08-26 16:08  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lex   2010-08-26 15:48  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lord garth   2010-08-26 15:40  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: whatadeal   2010-08-26 15:02  

00:00