You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Airport body scans breach rights: UN expert
2010-03-10
Another ejaculation from Martin Scheinin, UN extra-special rapporteur
GENEVA - A UN expert on Tuesday said the growing use of full body scanners in airport security was a breach of individual rights. Martin Scheinin, the UN special rapporteur on the protection of human rights, said that while countering extremism scanners were both an ineffective means of prevention and an excessive intrusion into individual privacy.
Martin has a diplomatic passport so he doesn't get scanned, or searched, or have his baggage searched. Nice that he's thinking occasionally about the 'little people'.
"The use of a full body scanner which reveals graphic details of the human body, including the most private parts of it, very easily is a violation of human rights," Scheinin told journalists. "It would be a violation of human rights in respect to everyone, but there are particular sensitivities in respect of women, certain religions, certain cultural backgrounds," he added.
Thus channeling his masters in Riyadh ...
Scheinin, who was appointed to monitor the impact of anti-terror measures on individual freedoms five years ago, told the UN Human Rights Council that better detection technology could be better for human rights.

But the "hasty decision" by several countries to use full body scans following a failed Christmas Day bid by a passenger to explode hidden chemicals on a flight to the United States owed more to "a political response to be seen to 'do something'", he argued.
That might be true ...
"Full body scanners are a disproportionate intrusion into privacy when measures are not taken to minimise the negative impact on privacy," said Scheinin.

The UN rights expert said other handheld devices were available to detect explosives through clothing or a solid wall without the need to harm privacy. If those devices were used as a first stage to detect explosives, more intrusive measures would then be legitimate to examine suspects, Scheinin suggested.
Better yet, question every person and hand-search every item of luggage.
Posted by:Steve White

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2010-03-10 16:27  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-03-10 15:43  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Hotspur666   2010-03-10 12:42  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Swanimote   2010-03-10 10:43  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2010-03-10 09:37  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-03-10 09:27  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-03-10 07:50  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Parabellum   2010-03-10 07:21  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Oscar   2010-03-10 06:53  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-03-10 00:24  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: crosspatch   2010-03-10 00:09  

00:00