You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Obama's budget slashes moon mission, new rockets
2010-01-28
NASA's plans to return astronauts to the moon are dead. So are the rockets being designed to take them there -- that is, if President Barack Obama gets his way.

When the White House releases his budget proposal Monday, there will be no money for the Constellation program that was supposed to return humans to the moon by 2020. The troubled and expensive Ares I rocket that was to replace the space shuttle to ferry humans to space will be gone, along with money for its big brother, the Ares V cargo rocket that was to launch the fuel and supplies needed to take humans back to the moon.

There will be no lunar landers, no moon bases, no Constellation program at all.

In their place, according to White House insiders, agency officials, industry executives and congressional sources familiar with Obama's long-awaited plans for the space agency, NASA will look at developing a new "heavy-lift" rocket that one day will take humans and robots to explore beyond low Earth orbit. But that day will be years -- possibly even a decade or more -- away.

In the meantime, the White House will direct NASA to concentrate on Earth-science projects -- principally, researching and monitoring climate change -- and on a new technology research and development program that will one day make human exploration of asteroids and the inner solar system possible.

There will also be funding for private companies to develop capsules and rockets that can be used as space taxis to take astronauts on fixed-price contracts to and from the International Space Station -- a major change in the way the agency has done business for the past 50 years.

The White House budget request, which is certain to meet fierce resistance in Congress, scraps the Bush administration's Vision for Space Exploration and signals a major reorientation of NASA, especially in the area of human spaceflight.

"We certainly don't need to go back to the moon," said one administration official.
Posted by:Beavis

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: war on terror   2010-01-28 23:43  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pappy   2010-01-28 22:04  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2010-01-28 18:07  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Don Vito Anginegum8261   2010-01-28 17:15  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-01-28 16:45  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Play4Keeps   2010-01-28 16:18  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-01-28 15:42  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DoDo   2010-01-28 11:21  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-01-28 10:27  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-01-28 09:39  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-01-28 06:45  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 3dc   2010-01-28 01:59  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-01-28 01:21  

00:00