You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Military Airship Upgrade
2009-10-17
The U.S. military already uses a fleet of unmanned spy blimps to keep tabs on would-be enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq. Now, the Navy wants to upgrade the airships' sight and hearing, as part of its push for "wide area persistent surveillance."

The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division in Lakehurst New Jersey issued a call for research proposals this week, looking for all sorts of new sensors, sensor-processors, and communication relays to use on its new, snooping aerostats.

According to the Navy, the lighter-than-air-craft should also be able to see all across the spectrum -- from ultraviolet to visible light to infrared. The system should incorporate "advanced radar for target detection and tracking; laser radar for target tracking and identification; ESM [electronic support measures] for target location cueing and identification; C4I [Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence] for receiving and disseminating target information and secure transmission of imagery and target track data."

Ideas on other surveillance gear -- acoustic sensors, magnetic anomaly detectors, "biometrics technologies," and "non-cooperative ID sensors" -- are also welcome. Ditto the "insertion of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques into airborne sensors for situational optimization."
Though it sounds peculiar, why not mount an extremely long range sniper cannon? At the height of 5,000-15,000 feet, it could put a single round through the engine block of an advancing enemy vehicle.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-10-17 20:02  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .5MT   2009-10-17 14:54  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-10-17 13:01  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-10-17 12:42  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .5MT   2009-10-17 12:20  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker in Duitsland   2009-10-17 09:06  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-17 07:22  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-17 07:21  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Excalibur   2009-10-17 07:06  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-17 07:03  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gromky   2009-10-17 04:54  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-17 02:12  

00:00