You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senators turn back ID requirement for immigrant healthcare
2009-10-02
[The Hill] Senate Finance Committee Democrats rejected a proposed a requirement that immigrants prove their identity with photo identification when signing up for federal healthcare programs.

Finance Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said that current law and the healthcare bill under consideration are too lax and leave the door open to illegal immigrants defrauding the government using false or stolen identities to obtain benefits.

Grassley's amendment was beaten back 10-13 on a party-line vote.

The bill, authored by committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), would require applicants to verify their names, places of birth and Social Security numbers. In addition, legal immigrants would have to wait five years, as under current law, after obtaining citizenship or legal residency to access federal healthcare benefits such as Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program or receive tax credits or purchase insurance through the exchange created by the legislation.

But the would not require them to show a photo ID, such as a drivers license. Without that requirement, the bill "remains dearly lacking when it comes to identification," Grassley said. "Frankly, I'm very perplexed as to why anyone would oppose this amendment," he said.

But Democratic Sen. Jeff Bingaman, who represents the border state of New Mexico, said that the type of fraud Grassley said he wants to prevent is highly uncommon. "The way I see the amendment, it's a solution without a problem," Bingaman said.
Posted by:Fred

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-10-02 22:20  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-10-02 21:22  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Gruse Brown5488   2009-10-02 19:49  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2009-10-02 19:42  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DMFD   2009-10-02 12:02  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-10-02 11:36  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-10-02 10:16  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091   2009-10-02 02:00  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gorb   2009-10-02 01:21  

00:00