You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
WaPo Fixes Sights on F-22
2009-07-11
The United States' top fighter jet, the Lockheed Martin F-22, has recently required more than 30 hours of maintenance for every hour in the skies, pushing its hourly cost of flying to more than $44,000, a far higher figure than for the warplane it replaces, confidential Pentagon test results show.
THAT's not a very good ratio!
It's an air superiority fighter with a lot of new technology. They're fragile beasts when they're not in the air.
The aircraft's radar-absorbing metallic skin is the principal cause of its maintenance troubles, with unexpected shortcomings - such as vulnerability to rain and other abrasion - challenging Air Force and contractor technicians since the mid-1990s, according to Pentagon officials, internal documents and a former engineer.

While most aircraft fleets become easier and less costly to repair as they mature, key maintenance trends for the F-22 have been negative in recent years, and on average from October last year to this May, just 55 percent of the deployed F-22 fleet has been available to fulfill missions guarding U.S. airspace, the Defense Department acknowledged this week. The F-22 has never been flown over Iraq or Afghanistan.

Sensitive information about troubles with the nation's foremost air-defense fighter is emerging in the midst of a fight between the Obama administration and the Democrat-controlled Congress over whether the program should be halted next year at 187 planes, far short of what the Air Force and the F-22's contractors around the country had anticipated.

"It is a disgrace that you can fly a plane [an average of] only 1.7 hours before it gets a critical failure" that jeopardizes success of the aircraft's mission, said a Defense Department critic of the plane who is not authorized to speak on the record. Other skeptics inside the Pentagon note that the planes, designed 30 years ago to combat a Cold War adversary, have cost an average of $350 million apiece and say they are not a priority in the age of small wars and terrorist threats.

But other defense officials - reflecting sharp divisions inside the Pentagon about the wisdom of ending one of the largest arms programs in U.S. history - emphasize the plane's unsurpassed flying abilities, express renewed optimism that the troubles will abate and say the plane is worth the unexpected costs.
Posted by:Bobby

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2009-07-11 20:11  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rwv   2009-07-11 18:57  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Fozen Al   2009-07-11 17:33  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-07-11 17:02  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Plastic Snoopy   2009-07-11 16:15  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rammer   2009-07-11 15:30  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2009-07-11 13:23  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2009-07-11 11:55  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-07-11 11:41  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2009-07-11 09:20  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2009-07-11 01:27  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gorb   2009-07-11 00:42  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2009-07-11 00:40  

00:00