You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Burma 'Ready to Search Nork Ship'
2009-07-01
Perhaps this is the reason the Nork ship turned around, though anything the Burmese thugs say has to be taken with a grain of salt.
Rangoon says it will inspect the North Korean cargo ship Kangnam, which is suspected of heading to Burma carrying weapons-related materials, a news report said Tuesday. The Kangnam is being trailed by the missile destroyer USS John McCain.

Radio Free Asia on Tuesday said the Burmese junta has pledged to inspect the Kangnam and not to allow the North Korean ship to enter any Burmese port if it is carrying items banned by the UN.
It can't possibly be that the Burmese generals are actually worried about the UN. Perhaps their Chinese mentors are using them as a way to have the Norks turn the ship around without conceding anything?
Experts speculate that Burma was acting under international pressure. Inspection of North Korean vessels by individual states is encouraged by Clause 11 of the UN Security Council Resolution 1874, which was passed on June 12. But the resolution merely "calls upon" member states to inspect suspicious vessels, leaving the decision up to Burma. Rangoon may have been swayed by China and Russia, which both support the resolution, while South Korea and Japan are two major trading partners, RFA quoted unnamed observers as speculating.

Burmese authorities would be obliged to seize and dispose of any weapons and weapons-related materials they found under Clause 14 of the resolution.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-07-01 20:50  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-07-01 20:42  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-07-01 20:41  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-07-01 11:35  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-07-01 09:55  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-07-01 01:35  

00:00