You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
US Brings Back Vietnam Era No Fire Zones
2009-06-22
The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.

The order would be one of the strongest measures taken by a U.S. commander to protect Afghan civilians in battle. American commanders say such deaths hurt their mission because they turn average Afghans against the government and U.S. and NATO forces.

Civilian casualties are a major source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. The U.N. says U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the "number of Afghans shielded from violence," and not the number of militants killed.

McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

"But if there is a compound they're taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that's the option they should take," Smith said. "Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban."

McChrystal's predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, issued rules last fall that told commanders to set conditions "to minimize the need to resort to deadly force."

But McChrystal's orders will be more precise and have stronger language ordering forces to break off from battles, Smith said.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-06-22 21:55  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: European Conservative   2009-06-22 20:42  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-06-22 20:29  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2009-06-22 20:08  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-06-22 18:58  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Whutle Squank9189   2009-06-22 18:41  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Grampaw Clomoting7313   2009-06-22 17:14  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-06-22 16:35  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-06-22 16:28  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2009-06-22 15:37  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Victor Emmanuel Unusoth8468   2009-06-22 15:37  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Muggsy Glink   2009-06-22 15:25  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-06-22 14:46  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-06-22 14:35  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-06-22 14:07  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2009-06-22 13:51  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Xenophon   2009-06-22 13:38  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-06-22 13:37  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lagom   2009-06-22 13:32  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2009-06-22 13:29  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2009-06-22 13:24  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-06-22 12:52  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-06-22 12:42  

00:00