You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Little Rock soldier shooter sez he dunnit an' he wuz right
2009-06-10
"I do feel I'm not guilty," Abdulhakim Muhammad told The Associated Press in a collect call from the Pulaski County jail. "I don't think it was murder, because murder is when a person kills another person without justified reason."
A Muslim convert charged with fatally shooting an American soldier at a military recruiting center said Tuesday that he doesn't consider the killing a murder because U.S. military action in the Middle East made the killing justified.

"I do feel I'm not guilty," Abdulhakim [AP left out his middle name of Mujahid - ed.] Muhammad told The Associated Press in a collect call from the Pulaski County jail. "I don't think it was murder, because murder is when a person kills another person without justified reason."
What's he doing giving interviews to the AP?
Muhammad told the AP he admitted to his actions to police and said he was retaliating against the U.S. military. "Yes, I did tell the police upon my arrest that this was an act of retaliation, and not a reaction on the soldiers personally," Muhammad said. He called it "a act, for the sake of God, for the sake of Allah, the Lord of all the world, and also a retaliation on U.S. military."
Sounds like a terrorist to me ...
In the interview, Muhammad also disputed his lawyer's claim that he had been "radicalized" in a Yemeni prison and said fellow prisoners that some call terrorists were actually "very good Muslim brothers."

He also said he didn't specifically plan the shootings that morning. "It's been on my mind for awhile. It wasn't nothing planned really. It was just the heat of the moment, you know," said Muhammad, who was arrested on a highway shortly after the attack.

The Associated Press sent an interview request to Muhammad last week, before a judge ordered parties in the case to remain quiet. After Tuesday's interview, Muhammad's lawyer Jim Hensley sent an e-mail to the AP asking it to withhold his client's remarks.
And I'm surprised the AP didn't immediately clam up ...
Muhammad, 23, said he wanted revenge for claims that American military personnel had desecrated copies of the Quran and killed or raped Muslims. "For this reason, no Muslim, male or female, sane or insane, little, big, small, old can accept or tolerate," he said.
We can thank Newsweek for the Quran desecration story, and the MSM in general for the rest.
He said the U.S. military would never treat Christians and their Scriptures in the same manner. "U.S. soldiers are killing innocent Muslim men and women. We believe that we have to strike back. We believe in eye for an eye. We don't believe in turning the other cheek," he said.

Asked whether he considered the shootings at the recruiting center an act of war, Muhammad said "I didn't know the soldiers personally, but yes, it was an attack of retaliation. And I feel that other attacks, not by me or people I know, but definitely Muslims in this country and others elsewhere, are going to attack for doing those things they did," especially desecrating the Quran.

Last week, Hensley said his client, born Carlos Bledsoe, had been tortured and "radicalized" in a Yemeni prison after entering the country to teach English. He was held there for immigration violations, and Yemeni officials have denied mistreatment. "Those claims ... are all lies," Muhammad said Tuesday. "That never happened in Yemen. The officials dealt with me in a gentle way."
Come up with another line of defense, Mr. Lawyer ...
Posted by:Seafarious

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-06-10 19:19  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-06-10 17:51  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2009-06-10 16:09  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-06-10 15:49  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-06-10 11:57  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: WolfDog   2009-06-10 11:33  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-06-10 10:27  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: newc   2009-06-10 10:07  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jarong de Medici3580   2009-06-10 10:02  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2009-06-10 09:33  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2009-06-10 09:27  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-06-10 07:56  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2009-06-10 01:03  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-06-10 00:50  

00:00