Submit your comments on this article | |||
Economy | |||
Kerry aims to rescue Democrat Propaganda Organs; Will he include Tass and Izvestia ? | |||
2009-04-22 | |||
![]() Troubled by the possible shuttering of his hometown paper, Sen. John Kerry reached out to the Boston Globe on Tuesday, then called for Senate hearings to address the woes of the nation's print media.
"America's newspapers are struggling to survive, and while there will be serious consequences in terms of the lives and financial security of the employees involved, including hundreds at the Globe, there will also be serious consequences for our democracy where diversity of opinion and strong debate are paramount," Mr. Kerry said.
"I am committed to your fight, committed to your industry and committed to ensuring that the vital public service newspapers provide does not disappear," Mr. Kerry told the Globe employees. Lawmakers are witnessing the crisis firsthand. Press watchdogs who once prowled Capitol Hill are disappearing, replaced by special-interest publications and foreign news organizations. In February, a study by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism found that in the past two decades, the number of American news organizations accredited to cover Congress fell by two-thirds - from 564 in 1985 to 160 in early 2007. More cutbacks have been made since then. Washington once hosted 71 newspaper bureaus; now there are 25. Policy-influencing, special-interest publications and foreign newspapers, however, have multiplied. For example, in 1968, there were 160 foreign journalists in Washington. Now there are nearly 800. Mr. Kerry, who has called for Senate hearings on "the future of journalism" to begin May 6, also cited the negative influence of "agenda-driven reporting" and media conglomerates. The new complexities of the marketplace have drawn other interest. Seeking to parse some potential policy solutions, the House Judiciary courts and competition policy subcommittee held a hearing Tuesday addressing fair competition, new business models and other alternatives for the troubled industry. "The decline of print newspapers doesn't mean the decline of journalism. What we need to have for journalism is journalists, and lots of them," testified Ben Scott of the Free Press, a nonpartisan group for media reform.
Last month, Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin, Maryland Democrat, introduced the Newspaper Revitalization Act" that would allow papers to operate as nonprofits, prompting many analysts to examine the political implications of the tactic. | |||
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC |
#9 It will be fun to watch the First Amendment challenges to whatever the Congress The Supremes should have fun deciding the meaning of "no law" and "abridging" and "the press", and maybe even take another whack at the anti-trust conflicts with all of the above. Your tax dollars at work! |
Posted by: Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division 2009-04-22 20:31 |
#8 "America's buggy whip manufacturers are struggling to survive, and while there will be serious consequences in terms of the lives and financial security of the employees involved, including hundreds at Globe Buggy Whips, Inc., there will also be serious consequences for our democracy where diversity of whip selection and whip styles are paramount," Mr. Kerry said. |
Posted by: Parabellum 2009-04-22 15:58 |
#7 Money talks, bullshit is what the news media purveys.![]() Putting Money Where Mouths Are: Media Donations Favor Dems 100-1 For those that think Fox leans towards the Republicans, examine where the political contributions went. Though it does look like Fox News discourages political donations, I think in the 2004 election Fox News went 60-40% in favor of Dems. Also posted to the wrong, but related thread. |
Posted by: ed 2009-04-22 14:33 |
#6 The only diversity of opinion is on Fox News - which is why they are kicking ass of MSNBC and CNN combined. Just about everyone else is as diverse as Pravda. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-04-22 13:48 |
#5 Liberals really believe that they're resisting total rightwing domination of the airwaves and newspapers. Seriously. |
Posted by: gromky 2009-04-22 13:41 |
#4 State sponsored media. Biased. What the Extreme Left Radicals need. Oh, they already have that, but now WE will be told to pay for it. |
Posted by: Good Money down the hole 2009-04-22 13:36 |
#3 If Churches were failing the Government would not step in because of "Separation of Church and State". How about "Separation of Press and State". It will be interesting to see how they attempt to get around this one. |
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC 2009-04-22 13:23 |
#2 If the "Boston Globe family" is betting on Jawnny Boy to come through for them, then they are in deep, deep shit... |
Posted by: tu3031 2009-04-22 12:57 |
#1 Makes sense for the left to subsidize newspapers. They owe the papers their jobs after all. |
Posted by: Iblis 2009-04-22 12:28 |